2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Relationship between Spatial Ability and Feedback Style in ITSs

Abstract: Abstract. Rapid and widespread development of computerised learning tools have proven the need for further exploration of the learners' personal characteristics in order to maximise the use of the current technology. In particular, this paper looks at the potential of accounting for spatial ability in ERM-Tutor; a constraint-based tutor that teaches logical database design. Our evaluation study shows no conclusive results to support a difference in effectiveness of the textual versus multimedia feedback presen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a learning task, students are usually informed whether their answers are correct or incorrect but they may have to wait for a period of time for the teacher to make corrections and to finally know their learning status. The traditional way loses the immediateness of thinking and correction but technology can solve the problem, so that students can receive feedbacks and assistance immediately (VanLehn 2006; Milik et al . 2008; Zakharov et al.…”
Section: Handheld Pet‐nurturing Game: Design Of the My‐mini‐pet Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a learning task, students are usually informed whether their answers are correct or incorrect but they may have to wait for a period of time for the teacher to make corrections and to finally know their learning status. The traditional way loses the immediateness of thinking and correction but technology can solve the problem, so that students can receive feedbacks and assistance immediately (VanLehn 2006; Milik et al . 2008; Zakharov et al.…”
Section: Handheld Pet‐nurturing Game: Design Of the My‐mini‐pet Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has also been some research focused on the types of feedback: cognitive feedback (VanLehn 2006); affective feedback (Zakharov et al . 2008); timing of feedback (including immediate feedback, Milik et al . 2008; delayed feedback); and content of feedback (whether positive or negative feedback).…”
Section: Handheld Pet‐nurturing Game: Design Of the My‐mini‐pet Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barnea [2] suggested that objects are better understood when represented, rotated, and reflected in three dimensions (3D). Milik et al [3] suggested that spatial ability is an important factor in the use of multimedia in education because learners need to absorb spatial information from sensory memory, maintain internal schemas (knowledge structures) in working memory, and make spatial transitions to consolidate information into long-term memory. Barnea [2] categorized visualization skills into three categories: spatial visualization, orientation, and relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the ITS developer could typically define a set of learners's stereotypes. For example, Milik et al, (2008) used two learner's stereotypes based on spatial ability into ERM-Tutor. Other example, Parvez and Blank (2008) defines a set of learner stereotypes based on Felder-Silverman learning style model (Felder and Silverman;1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%