2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.07.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the oxygen evolution reaction on Ir(111) electrode in acidic medium using conventional and dynamic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, Figure S6 shows that the potential always exceeded 1.6 V versus RHE and that the time required to reach the cutoff voltage was always less for the unsupported IrO x catalysts during the galvanostatic AST, especially for those that were thermally annealed. In contrast, the catalysts featuring a high ASD (e.g., nonannealed supported IrO x nanocatalysts) or those which were intrinsically very active toward the OER (e.g., anodically formed Ir oxide on thin-films or single crystals 15,38 ) electrocatalysed the OER at lower overpotential and performed best during the galvanostatic AST. A second reason to not consider the time required to reach the cutoff voltage as a criterion of stability has been evoked by Geiger et al 39 These authors related the abrupt and rapid increase in potential to the passivation of the backing electrode and the associated increase in contact resistance with the catalyst.…”
Section: Determination Of S-numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, Figure S6 shows that the potential always exceeded 1.6 V versus RHE and that the time required to reach the cutoff voltage was always less for the unsupported IrO x catalysts during the galvanostatic AST, especially for those that were thermally annealed. In contrast, the catalysts featuring a high ASD (e.g., nonannealed supported IrO x nanocatalysts) or those which were intrinsically very active toward the OER (e.g., anodically formed Ir oxide on thin-films or single crystals 15,38 ) electrocatalysed the OER at lower overpotential and performed best during the galvanostatic AST. A second reason to not consider the time required to reach the cutoff voltage as a criterion of stability has been evoked by Geiger et al 39 These authors related the abrupt and rapid increase in potential to the passivation of the backing electrode and the associated increase in contact resistance with the catalyst.…”
Section: Determination Of S-numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…non-annealed supported IrOx nanocatalysts) or those which were intrinsically very active towards the OER (e.g. anodically formed Ir oxide on thin-films or single crystals 15,38 ) electrocatalysed the OER at lower overpotential, and best performed during the galvanostatic AST. A second reason to not consider the time required to reach the cut-off voltage as a criterion of stability has been evoked by Geiger et al 39 .…”
Section: Determination Of S-number Values For Supported and Unsupported Irox Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A slight Sn dissolution peak was noticed during the first positive going potential sweep. Itwas accompanied by a small, rapidly vanishing Ir dissolution peak (not synchronized with the Sn dissolution peak), which indicates that electrochemical conditioning leads to the formation of higher oxidation state Ir atoms which are more resistant towards electrochemical dissolution30,[40][41][57][58] . Similar results were obtained for IrO x /TaTO-2.5, and this is most obvious fromFigure 5dshowing the Ir mass lost (ng cm -2 ) per cycle for all the electrocatalysts investigated in this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterogeneous electrocatalysts have received ever-increasing attention owing to global issues such as climate change and energy supply. Since platinum group metals such as Pt, Pd, Ir, Rh, and Ru are particularly active in electrocatalysis, their development as catalysts has been fundamentally established by single crystals ( 1 6 ) and practically proceeded with alloying ( 7 , 8 ), surface defect engineering ( 9 , 10 ), and nanocrystal synthesis ( 7 , 11 ). Specifically, single-atom catalysts (SACs) have been prepared by coordinating single metal atoms with carbon-based supports or by embedding them into the defects in metal oxides/metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) to prevent the clustering ( 12 , 13 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%