2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021ja029261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Link Between Outer Radiation Belt Losses and Energetic Electron Escape at the Magnetopause: A Case Study Using Multi‐Mission Observations and Simulations

Abstract: Greater than tens of kiloelectronvolts energetic particles are regularly observed beyond the magnetopause at significantly higher intensities than expected from the solar wind and magnetosheath. However, the debate as to whether these particles (both electrons and ions) are of magnetospheric or solar origin began with the earliest in situ observations and has continued in the literature for several decades (e.g., review by Cohen et al., 2017, and references therein). The root of this debate focuses on whether … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(142 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interplanetary (IP) shocks generating strong electric field impulse can also cause rapid energization of radiation belt electrons within a time scale of few minutes (e.g., Foster et al (2015); Kanekal et al (2016)). The loss mechanism is driven by pitch-angle scattering of electrons and subsequent atmospheric precipitation led by wave-particle interactions (e.g., Thorne (1977); Rodger et al (2007); Reidy et al (2021)), or magnetopause shadowing caused by sudden magnetospheric compression (e.g., Yu et al (2013); Staples et al (2020); Cohen et al (2021)), or a combination of both (e.g., Summers and Thorne (2003); Bortnik et al (2006); Shprits et al (2006); Ukhorskiy et al (2006); Turner et al (2012); Blum et al (2015); Shprits et al (2017)). The relativistic electron dynamics also show strong dependence on several factors, such as, geomagnetic activity, solar wind driving conditions, spatial location, local time, and background magnetospheric conditions (e.g., Li et al (1997); Reeves et al (1998Reeves et al ( , 2003; Meredith et al (2003); Lee et al (2013); Ni et al (2013); Thorne et al (2013b,a); Baker et al (2013Baker et al ( , 2014b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interplanetary (IP) shocks generating strong electric field impulse can also cause rapid energization of radiation belt electrons within a time scale of few minutes (e.g., Foster et al (2015); Kanekal et al (2016)). The loss mechanism is driven by pitch-angle scattering of electrons and subsequent atmospheric precipitation led by wave-particle interactions (e.g., Thorne (1977); Rodger et al (2007); Reidy et al (2021)), or magnetopause shadowing caused by sudden magnetospheric compression (e.g., Yu et al (2013); Staples et al (2020); Cohen et al (2021)), or a combination of both (e.g., Summers and Thorne (2003); Bortnik et al (2006); Shprits et al (2006); Ukhorskiy et al (2006); Turner et al (2012); Blum et al (2015); Shprits et al (2017)). The relativistic electron dynamics also show strong dependence on several factors, such as, geomagnetic activity, solar wind driving conditions, spatial location, local time, and background magnetospheric conditions (e.g., Li et al (1997); Reeves et al (1998Reeves et al ( , 2003; Meredith et al (2003); Lee et al (2013); Ni et al (2013); Thorne et al (2013b,a); Baker et al (2013Baker et al ( , 2014b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future work will target events after August 2015 when data from the Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission (MMS) is available. The orbit of MMS allows investigation of PSD distributions beyond Van Allen Probes apogee eliminating the ambiguity of PSD gradients near geosynchronous orbit (e.g., Cohen et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acceleration from radial transport may prove to be a dominant process, which arises from inward radial diffusion (e.g., Kollmann et al, 2018) driven by: random field fluctuations in the magnetosphere or the ionosphere (e.g., Lejosne & Kollmann, 2020), centrifugally driven interchange (e.g., Mauk et al, 2002), or large-scale coherent transport (e.g., Hao et al, 2020). Non-adiabatic transport may occur during reconnection in the Jovian magnetodisk and/or magnetotail (e.g., Vogt et al, 2020) or at low altitudes (Masters et al, 2021), leading to acceleration processes that are in principle similar to those found in Earth's magnetotail (e.g., Turner et al, 2021;Cohen et al, 2021). One of the major thrusts of COMPASS is to cleanlymeaning high signal to noise through whatever means necessary-measure energy-and pitch-angle-resolved differential 1 MeV to > 50 MeV electron fluxes, 1 MeV to 1 GeV proton fluxes, and 1 MeV/nuc to > 1 GeV/nuc heavier ion fluxes in conjunction with a full spectrum of plasma wave measurements.…”
Section: Accelerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acceleration through adiabatic transport may arise from inward radial diffusion (De Pater and Goertz, 1994;Kollmann et al, 2018;Nenon et al, 2018) driven by random field fluctuations in the magnetosphere or the ionosphere (Lejosne and Kollmann, 2020), centrifugally driven interchange (Mauk et al, 2002), or convective transport via large-scale coherent plasma flows (Hao, Sun, Roussos, et al, 2020). Non-adiabatic transport may occur during COMPASS: A Heliophysics Mission Concept Study to Explore the Extremes of Jupiter's Magnetosphere A-3 reconnection (Vasyliunas et al, 1983;Vogt et al, 2010, Ebert et al, 2017, leading to acceleration processes similar to those found in Earth's magnetotail (e.g., Cohen et al, 2021;Turner et al 2021).…”
Section: Accelerationmentioning
confidence: 99%