2020
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1796804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the binding affinity, interaction, and structure-activity-relationship of 76 prescription antiviral drugs targeting RdRp and Mpro of SARS-CoV-2

Abstract: SARS-CoV-2 virus outbreak poses a major threat to humans worldwide due to its highly contagious nature. In this study, molecular docking, molecular dynamics, and structure-activity relationship are employed to assess the binding affinity and interaction of 76 prescription drugs against RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and Main Protease (Mpro) of SARS-CoV-2. The RNA-dependent RNA polymerase is a vital enzyme of coronavirus replication/transcription complex whereas the main protease acts on the proteolysis of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional in-silico investigation of the binding poses of cobicistat to the 3CLpro of SARS-CoV-2 corroborated the potential affinity of this drug 3CLpro ( Figure 1A,B). Moreover, our results were in line with similar independent analyses of other groups (43)(44)(45) We then tested the effect of cobicistat on SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro. For this purpose, we conducted a time course analysis of the effect of different concentrations of cobicistat on intracellular viral RNA replication and release of virus into the culture supernatant of Calu-3 cells (Figure 1C-E; Supplementary Figure 1A,B).…”
Section: In-silico and In-vitro Analyses Identify Cobicistat As A Cansupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Additional in-silico investigation of the binding poses of cobicistat to the 3CLpro of SARS-CoV-2 corroborated the potential affinity of this drug 3CLpro ( Figure 1A,B). Moreover, our results were in line with similar independent analyses of other groups (43)(44)(45) We then tested the effect of cobicistat on SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro. For this purpose, we conducted a time course analysis of the effect of different concentrations of cobicistat on intracellular viral RNA replication and release of virus into the culture supernatant of Calu-3 cells (Figure 1C-E; Supplementary Figure 1A,B).…”
Section: In-silico and In-vitro Analyses Identify Cobicistat As A Cansupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It should be noted that simeprevir was also described to impact cellular innate immune responses 61 and that alternative viral targets, including nsp3 (papain like protease domain), nsp12 (polymerase), nsp13 (helicase), nsp14 (exonuclease and methyltransferase), nsp15 (endoribonuclease), nsp16 (2’-o-ribose methyltransferase), as well as structural proteins N (capsid) and Spike, were suggested for paritaprevir, grazoprevir and simeprevir by modelling studies. 53,67,7882 Future detailed molecular studies are required to fully define the viral targets of different HCV PI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existent variability in the MD trajectory was observed by different multivariate energy factors in the low-dimensional space (De Jong, 1990 ; Wold et al., 1987 ). The centering and scaling were executed for data pre-processing (Ahmed, Mahtarin, et al., 2020 ; Chowdhury et al., 2020 ). In the analysis, final 90 ns MD trajectories were utilized to reveal the variations among the model structures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%