2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0266-9_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating T Cell Receptor Signals In Situ by Two-Photon Microscopy of Thymocytes Expressing Genetic Reporters in Low-Density Chimeras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard methods such as flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and imaging of excised tissue have been applied to study the thymus in preclinical mouse models but these are limited to ex vivo analysis. Ex vivo culture systems (Hong & Moore, 1996;Ramsdell et al, 2006) including thymic slices (Bhakta et al, 2005;Ehrlich et al, 2009;Fournier et al, 2020;Le Borgne et al, 2009;Markert et al, 1997;Zhou et al, 2020) and whole organ imaging (Campinoti et al, 2020;Dzhagalov et al, 2012) are very powerful systems for studying certain aspects of thymus biology such as thymocyte-stromal interactions (Ladi et al, 2008;Nakagawa et al, 2012) and T cell development (Le Borgne et al, 2009;Witt et al, 2005), but these techniques lack blood flow and may not fully recapitulate the in vivo situation. Due to a lack of viable intravital imaging methods for the native thymus, researchers have relied on thymus transplantation to optically accessible sites including the kidney capsule (Caetano et al, 2012;Gregorio et al, 2021;Iwai & Inaba, 2015;Morillon et al, 2015), anterior chamber of the eye (Oltra & Caicedo, 2018), and pinna of the mouse ear (Chen et al, 2013) for intravital microscopy, but transplantation may alter the native vascular connections and exposes the tissue to an aberrant environment (Caetano et al, 2012;Vollmann et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard methods such as flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and imaging of excised tissue have been applied to study the thymus in preclinical mouse models but these are limited to ex vivo analysis. Ex vivo culture systems (Hong & Moore, 1996;Ramsdell et al, 2006) including thymic slices (Bhakta et al, 2005;Ehrlich et al, 2009;Fournier et al, 2020;Le Borgne et al, 2009;Markert et al, 1997;Zhou et al, 2020) and whole organ imaging (Campinoti et al, 2020;Dzhagalov et al, 2012) are very powerful systems for studying certain aspects of thymus biology such as thymocyte-stromal interactions (Ladi et al, 2008;Nakagawa et al, 2012) and T cell development (Le Borgne et al, 2009;Witt et al, 2005), but these techniques lack blood flow and may not fully recapitulate the in vivo situation. Due to a lack of viable intravital imaging methods for the native thymus, researchers have relied on thymus transplantation to optically accessible sites including the kidney capsule (Caetano et al, 2012;Gregorio et al, 2021;Iwai & Inaba, 2015;Morillon et al, 2015), anterior chamber of the eye (Oltra & Caicedo, 2018), and pinna of the mouse ear (Chen et al, 2013) for intravital microscopy, but transplantation may alter the native vascular connections and exposes the tissue to an aberrant environment (Caetano et al, 2012;Vollmann et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%