2019
DOI: 10.1007/s41979-019-00012-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating School Climate and School Leadership Factors that Impact Secondary STEM Teacher Retention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, another study showed that teachers who feel they have control over their teaching environment are less likely to leave (Justice, 2018). These findings suggest that improving institutional climate can be an important strategy for retaining quality teachers (Suárez & Wright, 2019;Miller, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Link Between Institutional Climate and Teachers' Retentionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, another study showed that teachers who feel they have control over their teaching environment are less likely to leave (Justice, 2018). These findings suggest that improving institutional climate can be an important strategy for retaining quality teachers (Suárez & Wright, 2019;Miller, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Link Between Institutional Climate and Teachers' Retentionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Based on the findings of the research, it can be inferred that improving the institutional climate could help to retain quality teachers (Young, 2018;Suárez & Wright, 2019). Therefore, we develop hypothesis 1 of the study which claims that:…”
Section: Link Between Institutional Climate and Teachers' Retentionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the United States, research on teacher retention has tended to draw upon either large‐scale surveys of teachers produced by the National Center for Education Statistics (e.g. Ingersoll, 1997; Ingersoll et al, 2016; Ingersoll & May, 2012; Ingersoll et al, 2016; Marvel et al, 2007; Nguyen & Redding, 2018; Suárez & Wright, 2019; Tai et al, 2006), or from smaller‐scale qualitative studies that track relatively few teachers longitudinally (e.g. Bang & Luft, 2014; Ceven McNally, 2016; Luft et al, 2011; McGinnis et al, 2004; Roehrig & Luft, 2006; Saka et al, 2013).…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%