2011 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iscc.2011.5983946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating quality of Experience and Learning (QoE & QoL) of audiovisual content broadcasting to learners over IP networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last few years, QoE ("Quality of Experience", 2011) has emerged as a fully user-oriented approach which focuses on the social element, users' subjective expectation and evaluation of systems' delivery and performance (Kalliris, Dimoulas, Veglis, & Matsiola, 2011;Kist & Brodie, 2012;W. Wu et al, 2009;Zhang, Xu, & Cheng, 2011).…”
Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the last few years, QoE ("Quality of Experience", 2011) has emerged as a fully user-oriented approach which focuses on the social element, users' subjective expectation and evaluation of systems' delivery and performance (Kalliris, Dimoulas, Veglis, & Matsiola, 2011;Kist & Brodie, 2012;W. Wu et al, 2009;Zhang, Xu, & Cheng, 2011).…”
Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having in mind the lack of literature that explores adult students' behavior, if we approach adult students the same as any distance education practitioner and reuse the variables of technology acceptance models aligned with adult learning theories, we can provide results that explain their nature and subjective experience. In the same context, different studies have already demonstrated QoE as a more holistic evaluation than mere narrowly focused end-user experience (Kalliris et al 2011;Molnar, Hava-Muntean, & Cristea, 2009;W. Wu et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various models have been developed for the prediction of the expected QoE (and QoL), using content attributes as inputs [2]- [6], [18]. While many works attempt to directly predict the final QoE using both Full Reference (FR) and Non Reference (NR) methods, including machine learning approaches [14]- [21], in other cases, content profiling and encoding quality classification taxonomies are employed [2]- [3]. An advantage of the last approach might be found on the fact that digitization and compression parameters can be defined prior to the selection of the content format and its final encoding /packaging, an issue that is quite useful in educational applications [3].…”
Section: Problem Definition and Background Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many works attempt to directly predict the final QoE using both Full Reference (FR) and Non Reference (NR) methods, including machine learning approaches [14]- [21], in other cases, content profiling and encoding quality classification taxonomies are employed [2]- [3]. An advantage of the last approach might be found on the fact that digitization and compression parameters can be defined prior to the selection of the content format and its final encoding /packaging, an issue that is quite useful in educational applications [3]. This also seems to be quite beneficial, considering that ground-truth libraries with already labeled content, in terms of quality profiles [2], cannot face all the demands that are encountered in various real world mediated learning scenarios.…”
Section: Problem Definition and Background Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation