2015
DOI: 10.1080/1359432x.2015.1011136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating occupational well-being and leadership from a person-centred longitudinal approach: congruence of well-being and perceived leadership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Respondents who continued participation at T2 (n = 262) did not differ from those who discontinued participation (n = 292) at T2 with respect to their ratings in any of the study variables at T1, or in gender or age (Perko, Kinnunen, Tolvanen, & Feldt, 2016). Concerning attrition between T2 and T3, participants who dropped out at T3 (n = 108) reported higher levels of exhaustion at T2 (M = 2.48 vs. M = 1.93), U = 8924.50, p < .001 than those who continued participation at T3 (n = 225).…”
Section: Attrition Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents who continued participation at T2 (n = 262) did not differ from those who discontinued participation (n = 292) at T2 with respect to their ratings in any of the study variables at T1, or in gender or age (Perko, Kinnunen, Tolvanen, & Feldt, 2016). Concerning attrition between T2 and T3, participants who dropped out at T3 (n = 108) reported higher levels of exhaustion at T2 (M = 2.48 vs. M = 1.93), U = 8924.50, p < .001 than those who continued participation at T3 (n = 225).…”
Section: Attrition Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the response rates of the current study are not uncommon. Attrition analyses reported previously (Perko et al, 2016) showed that those who continued participation at T2 did not markedly differ from those participants who dropped out from the study after T1. Compared to the eligible population in the organizational units at T2, women were overrepresented (76.8% vs. 87.1%) among the respondents in the sample used (χ 2 (1) = 19.53, p < .001).…”
Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The participants in the present cross-sectional study were public sector workers employed by four municipalities in Finland (N = 333). The data utilized in this study were collected in the late spring of 2012 at the second wave of longitudinal data collection in the larger project (see Perko, Kinnunen and Feldt, 2014;Perko, Kinnunen, Tolvanen and Feldt, 2016). Of the 333 participants in the second wave (T2), 262 had also participated in the first wave (T1) in the spring of 2011.…”
Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a leader is someone in a position who can affect the mental state of organizational members [21], he or she may affect employees' well-being. In the sense that authentic leaders are those who strive to make a positive organization by being honest to colleagues, team members, and the organization through self-awareness and self-regulation [9,4,12,22], authentic leadership will have positive effects on employees' well-being and health [23,24]. Well-being is a cognitive representation, optimal function, and experience of individuals regarding the nature and experience of well-being [13].…”
Section: Theoretical Background 21 Authentic Leadership and Employementioning
confidence: 99%