2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating ideal-solution based multicriteria decision making techniques for sustainability evaluation of urban mobility projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
59
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The method proposed by the authors differs from others presented in the literature [19,21] in that it covers the sphere of planning and implementation as well as the results stemming from these two areas. In particular, an important factor that is included in the analysis is the scope of the cooperation with stakeholders, other local authorities, which has a strong influence on the effective implementation of the strategy [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The method proposed by the authors differs from others presented in the literature [19,21] in that it covers the sphere of planning and implementation as well as the results stemming from these two areas. In particular, an important factor that is included in the analysis is the scope of the cooperation with stakeholders, other local authorities, which has a strong influence on the effective implementation of the strategy [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The benefit of using the proposed methodology is that evaluation of alternatives for location of remanufacturing plant can be done with limited or no quantitative information. Application of veto rule helps to overcome the limitation associated with the use of single MCDM method (Awasthi et al 2018). The proposed approach can be used by organizations who are in the early phase or planning to implement remanufacturing operations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The managers can vary the weights of categories of criteria according to their priorities. Since different MCDM techniques may yield different results, proposed approach has applied three MCDM techniques and chosen the alternative suggested by more than one technique, which has helped to overcome the limitation of using a single MCDM method (Awasthi et al 2018). Hence, this approach yields more reliable results, if not entirely unbiased.…”
Section: Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison to past DEMATEL-based research that has found causal relationships using data gathered from seven or fewer experts (Cui et al 2018;Awasthi et al, 2018), the current study had a larger sample, constituted by eighteen experts. Despite this, the assignment of equal weightages to the experts despite differences in their experience can question the robustness of the results.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%