2005
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-6-58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating hookworm genomes by comparative analysis of two Ancylostoma species

Abstract: Background: Hookworms, infecting over one billion people, are the mostly closely related major human parasites to the model nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Applying genomics techniques to these species, we analyzed 3,840 and 3,149 genes from Ancylostoma caninum and A. ceylanicum.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peptides predicted to be species-specific were significantly shorter in length, on average, than peptides with matches in other species (Additional file 2: Figure S1). This explains in part, the perceived sequence specificity in lieu of finding homologs as reported previously [17]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Peptides predicted to be species-specific were significantly shorter in length, on average, than peptides with matches in other species (Additional file 2: Figure S1). This explains in part, the perceived sequence specificity in lieu of finding homologs as reported previously [17]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…To identify bandit -like sequences in related hookworm species, the bandit transposase (342 amino acids) was queried against 4,953 polypeptides from A. ceylanicum [8] and 2,328 polypeptides from N. americanus [21]. Only the best homologous sequence is reported, including the identity and similarity values for the longest high-scoring segment pair (HSP) in each subject.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore first compared the generated sequences to genes known to exist in the model organism C. elegans (Table 2.). In addition to the two over-represented factors mentioned above ( If any of these conserved factors were later reported by others in descriptions of material from our libraries (Mitreva et al 2005), we do not here repeat analysis of relevant genes .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However we have attempted to retrospectively identify which of the above conserved factors are most prevalent when sampled with the larger SL1-cDNA set (Mitreva et al 2005). Based on the data included in Table 2, Table 2 lists additional homologues of C. elegans genes derived from clones from the SL1-capped cDNA libraries we provided, but strikingly absent from uncapped libraries provided by other collaborators.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%