2019
DOI: 10.29252/sjimu.27.3.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Factors Affecting Supply Chain Agility and Creating Competitive Advantage in Public Hospitals in Ilam Province

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, adequate attention to these dimensions can ensure the agility of hospital supply chains. Many studies corroborate the findings of this study [18,26,34,60,61]. "Knowledge management" obtained the rank zero in the final prioritization, something which is consistent with the findings of ISM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, adequate attention to these dimensions can ensure the agility of hospital supply chains. Many studies corroborate the findings of this study [18,26,34,60,61]. "Knowledge management" obtained the rank zero in the final prioritization, something which is consistent with the findings of ISM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Many studies have corroborated the major role that IT plays in SCM practices [58,59]. That is why many studies on the healthcare supply chain have focused on the role of e-commerce technologies in hospital SCM [60]. Consistent with the findings of this study, Vafaei et al showed that computerbased technologies, flexibility, relationships with suppliers, application of modern technologies, partnerships, market sensitivity, and demand response were the seven variables that affected the hospital SCM agility and brought competitive advantages for hospitals and medical centers [61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…While almost no previous research studies have been published in the area of developing individuals' capacity to teach English as a second language (ESL), a few context-specific evaluation studies do exist (de Dios Martinez Agudo, 2017). Specifically, we reviewed other evaluations of other teaching English as a foreign language (TEFL) training methods (Aliakbari & Ghoreyshi, 2013;de Dios Martinez Agudo, 2017;Karimnia & Kay, 2015), workplace learning methods (Kennedy, 2006;Manuti, Pastore, Scardigno, Giancaspro, & Morciano, 2015), and the evolution of ESL educational technology teaching strategies (Nomass, 2013). We drew upon Karakas's (2012) descriptions of the main components of TEFL, which include linguistic competence, pedagogy, and general teaching practices, to guide some of the evaluation item design.…”
Section: Theory Applied In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%