2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10579-019-09483-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating diachronic trends in phonological inventories using BDPROTO

Abstract: Here we present an expanded version of BDPROTO, a database comprising phonological inventory data from 257 ancient and reconstructed languages. These data were extracted from historical linguistic reconstructions and brought together into a single unified, normalized, accessible, and Unicode-compliant language resource. This dataset is publicly available and we aim to engage language scientists doing research on language change and language evolution. Furthermore, we identify a hitherto undiscussed temporal bi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We are aware that our reconstruction of walnut and chestnut history will be affected by adjustments and revisions based on the availability of linguistic databases and theoretical developments in linguistics. As explained by Moran, Grossman, and Verkerk (2020), variability in phonological inventories, development of new phylogenetic tools, redefinition of cultural/linguistic lineages, and dating methods progressively increase the knowledge of the major processes underlying the evolution of human language. Despite these limitations, our findings highlight the importance and cogency ( i ) an efficient integration of the relevant cultural factors in the classical genome (G) × environmental (E) model, and ( ii ) a systematic application of the biocultural diversity concept in the reconstruction of evolutionary history of tree species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are aware that our reconstruction of walnut and chestnut history will be affected by adjustments and revisions based on the availability of linguistic databases and theoretical developments in linguistics. As explained by Moran, Grossman, and Verkerk (2020), variability in phonological inventories, development of new phylogenetic tools, redefinition of cultural/linguistic lineages, and dating methods progressively increase the knowledge of the major processes underlying the evolution of human language. Despite these limitations, our findings highlight the importance and cogency ( i ) an efficient integration of the relevant cultural factors in the classical genome (G) × environmental (E) model, and ( ii ) a systematic application of the biocultural diversity concept in the reconstruction of evolutionary history of tree species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent approaches rely less on synchronic patterns and emphasize the diachronic transitions within particular families, relying on the incorporation of statistical methods and the traditional comparative method [60]. Such approaches may benefit from new databases such as BDPROTO, a collection of reconstructed phoneme inventories from proto languages [19]. These sorts of data can help scholars to reconstruct the probabilities of certain phonological changes over time.…”
Section: Vowels and Prosodymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliance on shorter stems could generate pressures for larger phoneme inventories, in order to more effectively disambiguate words earlier during their production [16, p. 113; 18]. Recent work, based on a newly constructed database of reconstructed sound inventories for proto languages, does observe that some ancient inventories tend towards fewer consonants than their descendant languages [19]. Yet, it is unclear how robust this tendency is across the world's language families.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, contrary to expectation, a recent study suggests that grammatical characters evolve faster than lexical data (Greenhill et al 2017). Differing rates of evolution are also found in phonology, specifically the rates of change in vowel inventories versus consonant inventories (Moran & Verkerk 2018;Moran et al 2020). An additional issue with grammatical characters is that the space of possibilities for a grammatical variable is Phylogenetic signal in phonotactics [3] often restricted.…”
Section: Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 79%