Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3132272.3132282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Communication Grounding in Cross-Surface Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building and Deploying Cross-Device Systems In-the-Wild: Many cross-device systems and interactions were built and tested in controlled lab setups (Table 5), often involving only a small set of simultaneous users. It is unclear how well the systems and interactions transition and scale to environments that are more representative of everyday interaction [135], what users' actual cross-device interactions are in their everyday lives [368], or how they may change their use of multiple devices outside the lab [151]. Researchers have therefore argued for in-the-wild deployments in users' typical environments [30,285] to better understand and support their actual tasks in their settings [179].…”
Section: Key Challenges and Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building and Deploying Cross-Device Systems In-the-Wild: Many cross-device systems and interactions were built and tested in controlled lab setups (Table 5), often involving only a small set of simultaneous users. It is unclear how well the systems and interactions transition and scale to environments that are more representative of everyday interaction [135], what users' actual cross-device interactions are in their everyday lives [368], or how they may change their use of multiple devices outside the lab [151]. Researchers have therefore argued for in-the-wild deployments in users' typical environments [30,285] to better understand and support their actual tasks in their settings [179].…”
Section: Key Challenges and Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%