NSG2021 1st Conference on Hydrogeophysics 2021
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.202120192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion of Hydraulic Conductivity from Induced Polarisation, Part A: Methodology and Verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been driven by the fact that ground-based IP methods comprise some of the most widely used techniques in mineral exploration, not only for the discovery of many anomalous mineralisation prospects due to their chargeable response (Meju, 2002), but also for the increasing ability to identify subsurface materials and mineralogy (Merriam (2007), Qi et al (2018), Feng et al (2020)). Approaches using thresholds of re-parameterisations (Fiandaca et al, 2018), modelling of 3D IP effects (Nunes et al, 2019), and detection of IP using various approaches (Kang et al, 2019;Viezzoli et al, 2021) are some examples. However, Bayesian inference on the detectability of IP effects in AEM data has not been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been driven by the fact that ground-based IP methods comprise some of the most widely used techniques in mineral exploration, not only for the discovery of many anomalous mineralisation prospects due to their chargeable response (Meju, 2002), but also for the increasing ability to identify subsurface materials and mineralogy (Merriam (2007), Qi et al (2018), Feng et al (2020)). Approaches using thresholds of re-parameterisations (Fiandaca et al, 2018), modelling of 3D IP effects (Nunes et al, 2019), and detection of IP using various approaches (Kang et al, 2019;Viezzoli et al, 2021) are some examples. However, Bayesian inference on the detectability of IP effects in AEM data has not been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%