1978
DOI: 10.1121/1.381848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion of articulatory-to-acoustic transformation in the vocal tract by a computer-sorting technique

Abstract: We present numerical methods for studying the relationship between the shape of the vocal tract and its acoustic output. For a stationary vocal tract, the articulatory-acoustic relationship can be represented as a multidimensional function of a multidimensional argument: y=f(x), where x, y are vectors describing the vocal-tract shape and the resulting acoustic output, respectively. Assuming that y may be computed for any x, we develop a procedure for inverting f(x). Inversion by computer sorting consists of co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
144
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
144
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the many-to-one relationship between articulatory configurations and acoustic values (e.g., Atal et al, 1978;Boë et al, 1992), an iterative procedure incorporating random search was carried out to retrieve over 50 possible articulatory configurations for each vowel, for a given growth stage. All of these configurations produce exactly the same formants, providing a sample of different articulatory configurations compatible with the acoustic output.…”
Section: Simulations With An Articulatory-to-acoustic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the many-to-one relationship between articulatory configurations and acoustic values (e.g., Atal et al, 1978;Boë et al, 1992), an iterative procedure incorporating random search was carried out to retrieve over 50 possible articulatory configurations for each vowel, for a given growth stage. All of these configurations produce exactly the same formants, providing a sample of different articulatory configurations compatible with the acoustic output.…”
Section: Simulations With An Articulatory-to-acoustic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…simply reflect non-errorful variation in the levels of co-contracting muscles. Also, acoustic investigations of speech errors do not allow for an unambiguous interpretation of the articulatory events that have rendered a particular acoustic outcome, due to the complex relationship between acoustics and articulations (Atal, Chang, Mathews, & Tukey, 1978;Chen, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing these constraints on the value of k, it turns out that the plateau of high F 2 values crosses the k = 3 line at n Ͼ 2. However, since the acoustic-to-articulatory mapping itself is well-known to be indeterminate (Atal et al, 1978), it should not be surprising that constraints on the values of F 1 , F 2 , and F 3 are not sufficient to uniquely determine the parameters of the procedure for finding the constriction in a given x-ray profile.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%