1974
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1101(74)90031-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion layer at the interface of Schottky diodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in Figure a–c, showing the evolution of E F,n and E F,p , match well with results from the device physics literature regarding minority carrier transport through a Schottky contact. To further verify that our implementation captures the physics of minority carrier transport (a necessary property for modeling SL pseudo-Schottky contacts), we have calculated the injection ratio ( Υ ) in Figure d. It is defined as the ratio of the hole current to the total current ( Υ = | J p |/| J p + J n |) under forward bias .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The results in Figure a–c, showing the evolution of E F,n and E F,p , match well with results from the device physics literature regarding minority carrier transport through a Schottky contact. To further verify that our implementation captures the physics of minority carrier transport (a necessary property for modeling SL pseudo-Schottky contacts), we have calculated the injection ratio ( Υ ) in Figure d. It is defined as the ratio of the hole current to the total current ( Υ = | J p |/| J p + J n |) under forward bias .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…16 Analytical solutions that more rigorously describe an inversion layer may be provided with additional approximations that consider the effective density of states in the conduction and valence bands with utilization of the Fermi−Dirac distribution. 40,41 The alternative case of semiconductor/electrolyte potential distribution occurs when a semiconductor has redox active surface states within the forbidden bandgap (Figure 4b). Under such conditions, raising the Fermi level from the flat band condition results in Faradaic electron transfer and partial reduction of the surface states.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that case, the TE component can be suppressed to the extent that it becomes comparable to (or even lower than) the diffusion current. Moreover, as a result of extreme band bending, an inversion layer can be induced at the MS interface, 1,18 which helps in sustaining the minority diffusion current even at high bias. In contrast, in conventional Schottky diodes, the diffusion current will readily be limited by series resistance and/or by a poor supply of minority carriers from the contact.…”
Section: High-barrier Schottky Contacts: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%