2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inventory component volatility and its relation to returns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter point is particularly interesting because it suggests that market perfomance is driven by a fundamentally different set of principles. This finding complements recent work (Steinker and Hoberg, 2013; Bendig et al, 2018) showing a positive association between inventory volatility and stock returns. From the lens of the newsvendor model, our results imply that not only are costs of overage and underage not symmetric, but that these costs vary along different financial dimensions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter point is particularly interesting because it suggests that market perfomance is driven by a fundamentally different set of principles. This finding complements recent work (Steinker and Hoberg, 2013; Bendig et al, 2018) showing a positive association between inventory volatility and stock returns. From the lens of the newsvendor model, our results imply that not only are costs of overage and underage not symmetric, but that these costs vary along different financial dimensions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Examples of such relationships include production flexibility and the number of dealerships in the case of the automotive industry (Cachon and Olivares, 2010); the time relative to the fiscal year end in publicly traded firms (Lai, 2008; Hoberg et al, 2017); and sales characteristics, gross margins, and capital intensity in the retail industry (Gaur et al, 2005). We refer the reader to Eroglu and Hofer (2011), Steinker et al (2016), and Bendig et al (2018) for recent reviews of different aspects of the empirical inventory literature and focus on the studies that are most immediately relevant to our topic.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when analyzing the relationship between stocks' productivity and financial performance, the researchers usually took aggregated inventories into account while failing to address their components (mix). Generally, there is a dearth of studies that take discrete inventory types into account in the literature (e.g., Capkun et al, 2009;Ganas and Hyz 2015;Balakrishnan et al, 1996;Boute et al, 2007;Eroglu and Hofer, 2011;Isaksson and Seifert, 2014;Lieberman et al, 1999, Gaur andBhattacharya, 2011;Manikas, 2017;Bendig, 2018;Shin et al, 2016). Hence, there is only a little knowledge of the impacts of discrete inventory types on corporate financial performance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, economic uncertainty and geopolitical factors appear to affect raw material prices [50]. In this sense, the purchases of bulk material are affected as well, thus subsequently impacting warehousing costs [31]. The evidence provided by Moschovou [38] demonstrate that warehousing and other support activities for the transport sector in Greece exhibited a considerable decline between 2009 and 2013, with observed annual drops in turnover by 32.2%, 10.8%, 7.9%, 4.8%, and 7.0%, respectively.…”
Section: Warehousingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, simulation modelling results provided by Bendavid et al [30] show that constrains in working capital lead to large inventory shortfalls and distort operational decisions, hence necessitating the deployment of a flexible and forward-looking working capital requirements approach. At a more granular level, Bendig et al [31] investigate a sample of U.S. manufacturing firms over the period 2005-2013 to examine operational risks and volatility in terms of three inventory components attributable to different supply chain echelons, namely: (i) raw materials, (ii) work-in-process, and (iii) finished goods. The study findings reveal a systematic increase of volatility in all three inventory components during the financial crisis era owing to the mismatch in the demand-supply nexus that further reflects upon investors' decisions on inventory positions.…”
Section: Inventory Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%