2005
DOI: 10.21236/ada440460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invasive Marine and Estuarine Animals of the South Atlantic and Puerto Rico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was surprising to find sixty fouling species on vessels in the Port of Recife in spite of the advice control of International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the very wide use of anti-fouling techniques, including paints. The predominance of arthropods in the fouling community sampled here (including crustaceans 47% of the species and insect chironomids and pycnogonids, both representing 2%) was also observed by Ray (2005), who observed respectively 27%, 20% and 6% for these taxa. Also Godwin (2003) observed that 35% of the hulls fouling species invaders to the Hawaiian isles were arthropods, against 16% and 13% of mollusks and polychaetes, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…It was surprising to find sixty fouling species on vessels in the Port of Recife in spite of the advice control of International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the very wide use of anti-fouling techniques, including paints. The predominance of arthropods in the fouling community sampled here (including crustaceans 47% of the species and insect chironomids and pycnogonids, both representing 2%) was also observed by Ray (2005), who observed respectively 27%, 20% and 6% for these taxa. Also Godwin (2003) observed that 35% of the hulls fouling species invaders to the Hawaiian isles were arthropods, against 16% and 13% of mollusks and polychaetes, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%