2013
DOI: 10.1177/2049936113491936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invasive fungal infections in transplant recipients

Abstract: Invasive fungal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic stem cell transplant and solid organ transplant recipients. Evolving transplant modalities and techniques, complex and extensive immunosuppressant strategies, and the increased use of broad spectrum antifungal prophylaxis has greatly impacted the epidemiology and temporal pattern of invasive fungal infections in the transplant population. The goal of this article is to provide an up-to-date review of the most commonly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
42
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(265 reference statements)
0
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall prognosis of the invasive fungal infection depends upon multiple factors, including the site of infection, the rapidity of diagnosis, and the type and intensity of immunosuppressive medication use. Advances in antifungal therapy, such as the echinocandins, voriconazole, and posaconazole, may have made an impact on the selection of antifungals due to their broader spectrum of activity, their excellent safety profile, and their ease of use in critically ill, immunosuppressed patients . Despite the development of newer antifungal agents, in our study, we did not find any statistically significant differences in patient or graft survival before versus after 2003, possibly due to the use of stronger immunosuppressive medications, more frequent treatment of antibody‐mediated rejection and selection of older candidates for transplantation after 2003.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The overall prognosis of the invasive fungal infection depends upon multiple factors, including the site of infection, the rapidity of diagnosis, and the type and intensity of immunosuppressive medication use. Advances in antifungal therapy, such as the echinocandins, voriconazole, and posaconazole, may have made an impact on the selection of antifungals due to their broader spectrum of activity, their excellent safety profile, and their ease of use in critically ill, immunosuppressed patients . Despite the development of newer antifungal agents, in our study, we did not find any statistically significant differences in patient or graft survival before versus after 2003, possibly due to the use of stronger immunosuppressive medications, more frequent treatment of antibody‐mediated rejection and selection of older candidates for transplantation after 2003.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…This condition is exacerbated especially in patients with compromised immunity. For instance, in the US as of November 2013 with 19,262 organs transplants there was a concomitant increase in the susceptibility of these immunocompromised patients to invasive fungal infections [13,14]. In order to develop better treatment strategies it is important to understand the antifungal drug-resistance mechanisms developed by fungal cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common clinical presentations are onychomycosis, keratitis, allergic disease (sinusitis and bronchopulmonary disease) for nonimmunocompromised patients and disseminated disease, as well as other severe invasive infections, in immunocompromised hosts (e.g., patients with prolonged neutropenia and T-cell immunodeficiency) (1,4,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Amphotericin B lipid formulations, voriconazole, posaconazole, and, to a lesser extent, itraconazole have been recommended or used for the treatment and prophylaxis of Fusarium infections, in addition to surgical debridement and reversal of immunosuppression (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). The survival rate is low, with some reports suggesting 30% or less, for fusariosis, especially among patients with persistent neutropenia (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%