2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2011.03.334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invagination intestinale aiguë révélant une maladie cœliaque : à propos d’un cas et revue de la littérature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The small-bowel intussusception can be transient and self limiting if it is less than 3 cm long [6]. A common feature of intussusception in CD is its recurrent character [14][15][16]. The association between acute bowel intussusception and CD has been often described in children [17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small-bowel intussusception can be transient and self limiting if it is less than 3 cm long [6]. A common feature of intussusception in CD is its recurrent character [14][15][16]. The association between acute bowel intussusception and CD has been often described in children [17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gluten sensitive enteropathy, CD, is an autoimmune reaction to the gliadin fraction of gluten present in cereals as barley, rye and wheat [6]. The disease presents with villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia after ingestion of gluten [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But intussusception as a presenting symptom of pediatric celiac disease has been very rarely reported [2]. Although intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in children [12] and celiac disease is a frequent small bowel disease [13], they rarely had been reported in association with each other. In the past decades when barium studies were used more commonly in the diagnosis of malabsorption, transient intussusception was seen in 20% of patients with proven celiac disease [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%