Time Work 2020
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv1tbhq6s.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lockdown-present may have been a momentary ‘deceleration’ (Cuzzocrea, 2019) of the ‘acceleration’ (Rosa, 2013) of certain parts of society, and could be understood as a form of ‘extended present’ (Brannen and Nilsen, 2002) in which the girls developed morphing temporality to creatively construct visions of their future. The combination of spatial lockdown constraints and contested life course events may have led to a greater need for ‘temporal agency’ (Flaherty, 2020), having inspired them to develop morphing temporality as a strategy of ‘temporal resistance and resilience’ (Leccardi, 2020), a form of ‘time work’ (Flaherty, 2002) and of creative temporal agency construction (Cahill and Leccardi, 2020) to construct a ‘self-in-time’ and maintain a self-identity (Charmaz, 1991). In the temporally limited state of the lockdown-present as a state of exception, the girls may have been freed from having to pretend ‘okayness’ (Cahill and Cook, 2020), prompting them to think outside the normative box about societal issues and construct visions of the future that creatively contextualised biographical and societal visions of the future through a strategy of morphing temporality .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lockdown-present may have been a momentary ‘deceleration’ (Cuzzocrea, 2019) of the ‘acceleration’ (Rosa, 2013) of certain parts of society, and could be understood as a form of ‘extended present’ (Brannen and Nilsen, 2002) in which the girls developed morphing temporality to creatively construct visions of their future. The combination of spatial lockdown constraints and contested life course events may have led to a greater need for ‘temporal agency’ (Flaherty, 2020), having inspired them to develop morphing temporality as a strategy of ‘temporal resistance and resilience’ (Leccardi, 2020), a form of ‘time work’ (Flaherty, 2002) and of creative temporal agency construction (Cahill and Leccardi, 2020) to construct a ‘self-in-time’ and maintain a self-identity (Charmaz, 1991). In the temporally limited state of the lockdown-present as a state of exception, the girls may have been freed from having to pretend ‘okayness’ (Cahill and Cook, 2020), prompting them to think outside the normative box about societal issues and construct visions of the future that creatively contextualised biographical and societal visions of the future through a strategy of morphing temporality .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faced with these frictions, challenges, and impositions of unwanted time, the riders employed different tactics to avoid them. In order to examine the riders’ temporal experiences, we use Michael Flaherty’s analytical framework of time work (2003; 2011; see also Flaherty et al, 2020) to disentangle the creativity and skilfulness with which the riders attempt to make the app time and its entanglements with the spatiotemporal food delivery economy of Brussels fit their own lives. Flaherty defines time work as the ‘(…) individual or interpersonal efforts to create or suppress particular kinds of temporal experience’ (2003: 17).…”
Section: The Riders’ Time Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, Pépin’s sympathies are with his mother, so the story makes it easy for us to recognize “time work” in Maman’s strategy for reducing the temporal burden of her obligations (Flaherty, 2003, 2020). From this standpoint, her effort seems agentive, clever, noble, even heroic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%