2017
DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2017.1286780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to the themed section ‘digital heritage and the public’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The field of digital heritage started to take shape in the 1990s but has expanded more substantially in the last ten years, focussing especially on the roles and impact of digital technologies in museum and gallery contexts (for foundational work on the topic, see Fahy 1995;Anderson 1997;Arvanitis 2002;Galani and Chalmers 2002;Parry 2007aParry , 2007bParry , 2010Cameron and Kenderdine 2010). Since then, published material in this area has been concerned primarily with digital engagement with the past or the digitisation of analogue resources (see all the citations given above and, more recently, Kidd 2011;Geismar 2012;Ridge 2014;Were 2015;King, Stark and Cooke 2016;Díaz-Andreu 2017;Jones et al 2017), whereas literature dealing specifically with digitally-born and digitally-enabled research remains very limited. Moreover, the few existing studies of this kind tend to take one of two directions.…”
Section: Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of digital heritage started to take shape in the 1990s but has expanded more substantially in the last ten years, focussing especially on the roles and impact of digital technologies in museum and gallery contexts (for foundational work on the topic, see Fahy 1995;Anderson 1997;Arvanitis 2002;Galani and Chalmers 2002;Parry 2007aParry , 2007bParry , 2010Cameron and Kenderdine 2010). Since then, published material in this area has been concerned primarily with digital engagement with the past or the digitisation of analogue resources (see all the citations given above and, more recently, Kidd 2011;Geismar 2012;Ridge 2014;Were 2015;King, Stark and Cooke 2016;Díaz-Andreu 2017;Jones et al 2017), whereas literature dealing specifically with digitally-born and digitally-enabled research remains very limited. Moreover, the few existing studies of this kind tend to take one of two directions.…”
Section: Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors look at cultural content digitisation as far as it leading to changes in social interaction. The process of digitisation generates positive externalities, as it turns cultural centres into contact zones and into places of cultural and social mediation, in addition to linking the digital media with democracy [16]. On the one hand, access to cultural content through digital media creates an enhancement effect, thus increasing the number of visitors inside physical cultural institutions as well [17].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internet, as a kind of social media, could offer a crucial platform that is communitybased for sustainable and holistic heritage conservation [18]. It fosters an open atmosphere such that all the motivated participants can become involved in the cultural heritage protection easily with access to the internet [19,20]. Furthermore, ICTs offer an openparticipatory platform, in which citizens can play an active role, to a broader range of stakeholders across scales, classes, races, genders, ages, which is crucial for collaborative planning and conservation [21,22].…”
Section: The New Form Of Community: Online Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, mapping is one of the crucial tools to get an insight into the community mechanism and user's expectations [25,26,54,59,60]. Moreover, in some cases, online surveys based on selected platforms are spread to strengthen the right and ability of multi voices [19,28,33,36,55] It should be noted that the methods mentioned above are not exclusive of each other. Instead, they are utilized as an integrated toolkit a number of times.…”
Section: The Role Of Social Media In Sustainable Cultural Heritage Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%