2019
DOI: 10.4324/9781003021704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to Statistics with SPSS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SAS 9.4 was performed to analyze the mean comparison of the parental phenotypic data and the normal distribution test (variation range, mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis) and correlation analysis for the crude protein, NDF, ADF, and lignin of F 1 population. The frequency distribution of the F 1 population phenotypic data was plotted using SPSS 18.0 (Baarda and van Dijkum, 2019). The broad sense heritability (H 2 ) of each trait was calculated using the ANOVA function of the software QTL-IciMapping (Meng et al, 2015).…”
Section: Phenotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAS 9.4 was performed to analyze the mean comparison of the parental phenotypic data and the normal distribution test (variation range, mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis) and correlation analysis for the crude protein, NDF, ADF, and lignin of F 1 population. The frequency distribution of the F 1 population phenotypic data was plotted using SPSS 18.0 (Baarda and van Dijkum, 2019). The broad sense heritability (H 2 ) of each trait was calculated using the ANOVA function of the software QTL-IciMapping (Meng et al, 2015).…”
Section: Phenotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the convenience of fitting, the parameters under different puffing drying conditions were averaged to obtain six fitting points. Through the analysis software, the curve estimation of the fitting relationship between the mean ratio of each parameter and the expansion rate was carried out (Baarda & van Dijkum, 2019; Pengfei et al, 2022), and it was found that both did not obey the linear fitting relationship. To ensure an excellent fitting effect and make the fitting equation simpler and easier to use, a nonlinear relationship formula was used for expression as follows, yields: Y=italicaX3+italicbX2+cX+d where Y represents the expansion rate (rehydration ratio); X represents the mean ratio of microscopic cell parameters; a , b , c , and d are the coefficients, and the fitting results are depicted in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical methodology employed in this study was the use of a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the least significant difference (LSD) test at a significance level of 0.05. This approach was utilized to compare the differences between the various groups [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%