Introduction: The South China Sea: An International Law Perspective

Franckx, Erik; Benatar, Marco

doi:10.1163/15718085-12322061

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Претензии КНР подтверждались картой с изображением пунктирной U-образной линии (U-line), охватывающей значительную часть Южно-Китайского моря; авторы статьи отмечают непонятную природу U-line, необоснованность позиции КНР и эффективный протест региональных государств [25]. В 2017 г. под редакцией Э. Франка и М. Бенатара выходит специальный номер "The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law" «Южно-Китайское море: перспектива международного права» [26], где отмечается необходимость использования судебных и арбитражных процедур при разрешении ситуации в Южно-Китайском море [36]. Дж.…”

Section: обзор практики Icj Itlos и Pcaunclassified

Classification of Maritime Disputes and Modern Legal Means of their Resolution

Kirilenko

Alekseev

2022

jour

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A review of scientific articles published over the past 15 years in leading foreign scientific journals on international law demonstrates the gradual improvement of legal means for the settlement of maritime disputes between the states.Aim. Identification of the features for application of the law of the sea norms targeted on the resolution of maritime disputes that develop in the modern international system.Tasks. Development of the classification of maritime disputes, analysis of the jurisdiction of the judicial authorities competent to resolve maritime disputes, characterization of the provisions of international agreements and customs of the law of the sea in the resolution of maritime disputes by the International Court of Justice of the United Nations (ICJ), the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) and the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague (PCA).Methods. Discourse analysis of the most authoritative publications on the issue of resolving maritime disputes, a formal legal analysis of the norms and customs of maritime law, as well as a comparative legal study of judicial and arbitration practice in resolving interstate maritime disputes. Law enforcement practice on maritime disputes allows to characterize the subject of modern interstate maritime disputes; critically assess the fairness of decisions of international courts; to analyze the problems of enforceability of judicial and arbitral awards in the framework of the procedures for the settlement of maritime disputes provided for in the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.Results. Reasonable decisions of the International Court of Justice, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague are usually implemented by the states parties to the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Protection of the marine environment as well as prompt release of ships and crews from arrest have become a modern legal reality due to the effectiveness of the legal mechanism for resolving interstate maritime disputes. Territorial maritime disputes cause significant difficulties at all stages of their resolution, which is due to their political nature and the efforts of states to protect their national interests.Conclusion. The resolution of maritime territorial disputes requires more flexibility from the parties, an international agreement between the parties to the dispute on the procedure for its consideration, as well as the use of conciliation procedures to work out a compromise solution to the dispute.

show abstract

Section: обзор практики Icj Itlos и Pcaunclassified

Classification of Maritime Disputes and Modern Legal Means of their Resolution

Kirilenko

Alekseev

2022

jour

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Philippines then referred to the quote from the ICJ's Nicaragua case, which was reaffirmed by ITLOS in the Arctic Sunrise case. 61 The Philippines noted, in its memorial, that "China's non-appearance […] does not mean that the Tribunal has no basis on which to form a view as to China's posi-56 See Franckx and Benatar (2017). 57 See e.g., Gao and Jia (2013), and Zimmermann and Bäumler (2013).…”

Section: South China Seamentioning

confidence: 99%

Non-participation in Arbitral Proceedings Under Annex VII United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Arctic Sunrise and South China Sea Compared

Spijkers

2019

Interpretations of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea by International Courts and Tribunals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper analyzes the legal consequences of non-participation in arbitral proceedings under Annex VII to the United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC). Two recent examples of non-participation are analyzed and compared with each other: first, the case of the Arctic Sunrise, and second, the South China Sea case. The first case was instituted by the Netherlands against Russia. The second case was instituted by the Philippines against China. In both cases, the respondent State did not take part in any way in the arbitral proceedings. There are some striking similarities between the two cases. For example, in both cases, the respondent State made extensive reservations to jurisdiction, but the applicant State formulated its submissions in such a way that these reservations turned out not to be a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction by the tribunal. There are also some differences between the two cases: unlike Russia, China developed a quite sophisticated and relatively consistent legal argumentation, but it did so outside the arbitral process, in the media, at conferences, and in scholarly articles.1 This is not the first article to make a comparison between these two cases.

show abstract

Nichtteilnahme als Grenzphänomen zwischenstaatlicher Gerichts- und Schiedsverfahren – die Fälle South China Sea und Arctic Sunrise (Non-Participation in Inter-State Proceedings Before International Tribunals – the South China Sea and Arctic Sunrise Cases)

Wentker

2018

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The South China Sea: An International Law Perspective

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Classification of Maritime Disputes and Modern Legal Means of their Resolution

Classification of Maritime Disputes and Modern Legal Means of their Resolution

Non-participation in Arbitral Proceedings Under Annex VII United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Arctic Sunrise and South China Sea Compared

Nichtteilnahme als Grenzphänomen zwischenstaatlicher Gerichts- und Schiedsverfahren – die Fälle South China Sea und Arctic Sunrise (Non-Participation in Inter-State Proceedings Before International Tribunals – the South China Sea and Arctic Sunrise Cases)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About