The Right to Health at the Public/Private Divide 2014
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139814768.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Marrying Human Rights and Health Care Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This tendency towards the judicialization of healthcare has exerted an influence on many LMICs. Those legal actions are gradually altering national financial policies, and may lead to a weakening of the viability of public health insurance by redirecting funding further away from a rational application for the community welfare of the general public [ 33 ].…”
Section: Specific Challenges To Lmic Healthcare Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tendency towards the judicialization of healthcare has exerted an influence on many LMICs. Those legal actions are gradually altering national financial policies, and may lead to a weakening of the viability of public health insurance by redirecting funding further away from a rational application for the community welfare of the general public [ 33 ].…”
Section: Specific Challenges To Lmic Healthcare Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…66 The right to health has most commonly been employed to support claims relating to medical care, rather than public health, and often in the context of constitutional rights at the domestic, rather than international, level. 67 While there are several examples of international human rights law being used to address public health issues, 68 the extent to which the accountability and standards setting role matches the expectations set by the rhetorical role of human rights in public health is less clear.…”
Section: Public Health and Criteria Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical accuracy of the individual (social) rights' paradigm, predominant in the health law literature (Tobin 2012;Wolff 2012;Zuniga et al 2013;Flood & Gross 2014), is limited. Flood and Gross argue that in established democracies that are high-income countries with relatively strong public healthcare systems, access to healthcare historically developed with the rise of the modern welfare state, rather than through a rights' discourse (Flood & Gross 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The market paradigm also presents shortcomings. Beyond the question of whether health and healthcare constitute commodities, various characteristics of today's healthcare systems make healthcare unsuited for distribution through competition and the use of price mechanisms on a free market (Flood & Gross 2014;Tingh} og et al 2010). Also, access to healthcare goes beyond the pursuit of mere economic interests and includes social goals, such as equality in access, disconnection from the ability to pay, and the "rule of rescue."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation