The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2023
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving access to SLE therapies in low and middle-income countries

Abstract: SLE increases disease burden in those affected with it, and that is particularly the case in low- and middle-income countries. The 2019 Addressing Lupus Pillar of Health Advancement project is a multiphase initiative whose objective is to recognize, hierarchize and establish approaches for diligent SLE research, care and access to healthcare. Lack of access to high-cost medications that have been shown to be efficacious in the short term and that potentially reduce damage in SLE is a complex issue. In this rev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While several treatment recommendations acknowledge the GC-sparing effect of immunosuppressants and advanced therapies [ 20 , 38 , 39 ], socioeconomic barriers may prevent accessibility to these therapies, ultimately resulting in chronic GC use [ 43 ]. For example, oral GCs may be a favoured treatment option for uninsured individuals or in poorer countries due to their relatively low cost [ 7 ], while the cost of GC-sparing agents, such as biologics, is a key barrier preventing their recommendation more widely in the Asia-Pacific region [ 38 ] and in low- and middle-income countries [ 75 ]. This highlights the need for changes to healthcare policies to provide reimbursement of GC-sparing agents to help make a meaningful impact on the reduction of GC dependency in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several treatment recommendations acknowledge the GC-sparing effect of immunosuppressants and advanced therapies [ 20 , 38 , 39 ], socioeconomic barriers may prevent accessibility to these therapies, ultimately resulting in chronic GC use [ 43 ]. For example, oral GCs may be a favoured treatment option for uninsured individuals or in poorer countries due to their relatively low cost [ 7 ], while the cost of GC-sparing agents, such as biologics, is a key barrier preventing their recommendation more widely in the Asia-Pacific region [ 38 ] and in low- and middle-income countries [ 75 ]. This highlights the need for changes to healthcare policies to provide reimbursement of GC-sparing agents to help make a meaningful impact on the reduction of GC dependency in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if a patient has medical insurance and the opportunity to be taken care by a rheumatologist, some medications are not available in LMICs. For example, the recently approved therapies for SLE (belimumab, anifrolumab and voclosporin) are not available in many LMICs [ 5 ]; furthermore, in the countries in which these treatments are available, they are not always covered by the health-care system, making their access almost impossible for those with a low socio-economic status. This lack of access to new treatments could result in an increase in the daily prednisone dose [ 17 ], with the subsequent risk of damage accrual.…”
Section: Challenges In Lmicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, LMICs should work together, promoting the availability of drugs through mass acquisitions, reducing their cost, or encouraging generics and biosimilars via more flexible patent laws [ 5 ]. Health technology assessment of these drugs should be undertaken, while recognizing the complexity of diagnosis, disease progression and management, which makes the assessments challenging [ 26 ].…”
Section: Challenges In Lmicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation