Abstract:SLE increases disease burden in those affected with it, and that is particularly the case in low- and middle-income countries. The 2019 Addressing Lupus Pillar of Health Advancement project is a multiphase initiative whose objective is to recognize, hierarchize and establish approaches for diligent SLE research, care and access to healthcare. Lack of access to high-cost medications that have been shown to be efficacious in the short term and that potentially reduce damage in SLE is a complex issue. In this rev… Show more
“…While several treatment recommendations acknowledge the GC-sparing effect of immunosuppressants and advanced therapies [ 20 , 38 , 39 ], socioeconomic barriers may prevent accessibility to these therapies, ultimately resulting in chronic GC use [ 43 ]. For example, oral GCs may be a favoured treatment option for uninsured individuals or in poorer countries due to their relatively low cost [ 7 ], while the cost of GC-sparing agents, such as biologics, is a key barrier preventing their recommendation more widely in the Asia-Pacific region [ 38 ] and in low- and middle-income countries [ 75 ]. This highlights the need for changes to healthcare policies to provide reimbursement of GC-sparing agents to help make a meaningful impact on the reduction of GC dependency in clinical practice.…”
Glucocorticoids (GCs) have revolutionized the management of SLE, providing patients with rapid symptomatic relief and preventing flares when maintained at low dosages. However, there are increasing concerns over GC-associated adverse effects (AEs) and organ damage, which decrease patients’ quality of life (QOL) and increase healthcare costs. This highlights the need to balance effective GC use and minimize toxicity in patients with SLE. Herein, we provide an overview of the theoretical considerations and clinical evidence, in addition to the variations and similarities across nine national and eight international recommendations regarding the use of GCs across SLE manifestations and how these compare with real-world usage. In line with this, we propose possible actions toward the goal of GC Stewardship to improve the QOL for patients with lupus while managing the disease burden.
“…While several treatment recommendations acknowledge the GC-sparing effect of immunosuppressants and advanced therapies [ 20 , 38 , 39 ], socioeconomic barriers may prevent accessibility to these therapies, ultimately resulting in chronic GC use [ 43 ]. For example, oral GCs may be a favoured treatment option for uninsured individuals or in poorer countries due to their relatively low cost [ 7 ], while the cost of GC-sparing agents, such as biologics, is a key barrier preventing their recommendation more widely in the Asia-Pacific region [ 38 ] and in low- and middle-income countries [ 75 ]. This highlights the need for changes to healthcare policies to provide reimbursement of GC-sparing agents to help make a meaningful impact on the reduction of GC dependency in clinical practice.…”
Glucocorticoids (GCs) have revolutionized the management of SLE, providing patients with rapid symptomatic relief and preventing flares when maintained at low dosages. However, there are increasing concerns over GC-associated adverse effects (AEs) and organ damage, which decrease patients’ quality of life (QOL) and increase healthcare costs. This highlights the need to balance effective GC use and minimize toxicity in patients with SLE. Herein, we provide an overview of the theoretical considerations and clinical evidence, in addition to the variations and similarities across nine national and eight international recommendations regarding the use of GCs across SLE manifestations and how these compare with real-world usage. In line with this, we propose possible actions toward the goal of GC Stewardship to improve the QOL for patients with lupus while managing the disease burden.
“…Even if a patient has medical insurance and the opportunity to be taken care by a rheumatologist, some medications are not available in LMICs. For example, the recently approved therapies for SLE (belimumab, anifrolumab and voclosporin) are not available in many LMICs [ 5 ]; furthermore, in the countries in which these treatments are available, they are not always covered by the health-care system, making their access almost impossible for those with a low socio-economic status. This lack of access to new treatments could result in an increase in the daily prednisone dose [ 17 ], with the subsequent risk of damage accrual.…”
Section: Challenges In Lmicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, LMICs should work together, promoting the availability of drugs through mass acquisitions, reducing their cost, or encouraging generics and biosimilars via more flexible patent laws [ 5 ]. Health technology assessment of these drugs should be undertaken, while recognizing the complexity of diagnosis, disease progression and management, which makes the assessments challenging [ 26 ].…”
Section: Challenges In Lmicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, patients often suffer significant delays in diagnosis [ 3 ], increasing their burden of disease and the risk of organ damage. These difficulties are even more pronounced in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where limited health infrastructure and resources can further restrict access to specialist care [ 4 , 5 ]. Many SLE patients in these regions lack access to essential diagnostic tests and therapies, particularly the latest biologics.…”
SLE presents significant challenges for patients and health-care professionals (HCPs), both across Europe and worldwide. Improving health-care outcomes for patients with SLE requires a comprehensive understanding of patient disease pathways. In particular, the geographical distance between SLE patients and specialized care centres, combined with the scarcity of rheumatologists, exacerbates delays in diagnosis and management. Also, the initial SLE symptoms can often be non-specific, and providing guidelines for primary HCPs and other non-specialists is extremely important. Improvement in access to treatment is also important, with several recently approved therapies for SLE not being available in several European countries and many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Furthermore, in the LMICs in which these treatments are available, they are not always covered by the health-care system, making their access almost impossible for those of lower socio-economic status. A number of provisions are already in place within the European Union, to improve access to care for patients with rare and complex diseases, including those with SLE. In particular, European Reference Networks (ERNs), such the ERN for Autoimmune Diseases ReCONNET, are virtual networks involving HCPs across Europe with the aim of improving the care of patients with rare and complex diseases that require highly specialized treatment and a concentration of knowledge and resources. In addition, lupus patient organizations such as Lupus Europe play a crucial role in raising awareness of SLE and advocating for improved access to care. Together, we can work towards a future where all people living with lupus receive the comprehensive and timely care they deserve.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.