Contested Concepts in Gender and Social Politics 2002
DOI: 10.4337/9781781950340.00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Contested Concepts in Gender and Social Politics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consideration of leave as a right/duty is connected to different parents' approaches to childcare. Childcare may be considered by both parents from two perspectives: as a duty derived from having children, and as a social right which needs to be granted (Hobson et al ., ). Individual/couple decisions. Intra‐family negotiations regarding the allocation of time at work and household activities have been studied (Geisler and Kreyenfeld, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The consideration of leave as a right/duty is connected to different parents' approaches to childcare. Childcare may be considered by both parents from two perspectives: as a duty derived from having children, and as a social right which needs to be granted (Hobson et al ., ). Individual/couple decisions. Intra‐family negotiations regarding the allocation of time at work and household activities have been studied (Geisler and Kreyenfeld, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For more on how welfare state scholarship has neglected issues of care and service, focusing on paid work and income maintenance instead, see Hobson et al . () and Towns ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New forms of flexible work and changes in welfarism have therefore become particularly problematic for women 24 . As Hobson et al (2002;5) note:…”
Section: Family Living Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, neo-liberalism has produced a new type of 'welfare' contract. Hobson et al (2002;7) argue that the most important change is in the assumptions underlying welfare provision, and the ways in which governments provide social assistance. Here, in late modern neo-liberal economies, the emphasis has shifted from public to private provision, from centralised redistribution on the basis of need to market allocation, from universality to targeting, from tax based to user-pays regimes, from central planning to decentralisation, and from collective claims of social rights or entitlements to the individual demonstration of responsibility (Boston, 1999).…”
Section: Family Living Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation