Routledge Handbook of NGOs and International Relations 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9781315268927-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing NGOs and International Relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings agreed with those of Davies (2019) who found out that organizational goals depended on the programmes and the projects of focus for the organization. These projects and programmes were designed for the needs of the organization's beneficiaries.…”
Section: Realization Of Superordinate Goalssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings agreed with those of Davies (2019) who found out that organizational goals depended on the programmes and the projects of focus for the organization. These projects and programmes were designed for the needs of the organization's beneficiaries.…”
Section: Realization Of Superordinate Goalssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Superordinate goals in NGOs are tied to the projects that organizations focus on. Therefore, efforts are focused on ensuring projects' success in terms of service provision or attaining effectiveness (Davies, 2019). Despite these efforts, NGOs, find it difficult to attain their superordinate goals as they face challenges to adapt and be flexible to changes as well as align the specialized tasks and organizational goals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In International Relations literature, there are significant efforts to develop approaches to study the participation of non-governmental actors in multilateral organizations and global governance (Davies, 2019;DeMars & Dijkzeul, 2015;Willetts, 2011). In this analysis, we study contemporary practices of diplomacy from a state perspective, which involves thinking about problems that were not previously considered relevant to the subfield of diplomatic studies (Hamilton & Langhorne, 2010;Riordan, 2004).…”
Section: Network Diplomacy and Civil Societymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In IR the everyday has become synonymous with the makings of actual subjects in their most quotidian roles (Autesserre 2014;Hobson and Seabrooke 2007;Mitchell 2011b;Neumann 2002). This is not so much a new field of study, as it represents a common call throughout the social sciences, and especially from critical theorists, to connect the micro-dynamics of daily life with macro structures and processes, even as a way of embodying them (Bleiker 2000;Davies and Niemann 2009;Enloe 1989;Marchand 2000;Tickner 2005;Wilcox 2015). In peace and conflict studies, 'practices' and 'everydayness' have always been the epistemological choice.…”
Section: Patterns and Practices Of Everyday Resistance: A View From B...mentioning
confidence: 99%