2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing decorated HODs: modelling assembly bias in the galaxy–halo connection

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
168
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
2
168
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that vacc or v peak were best able to reproduce clustering statistics when modelling a sample of SDSS galaxies with M * > 10 10 M . More recently, Lehmann et al (2015) have shown that stellar content likely depends not just on halo mass but also concentration, while Hearin et al (2016) have developed a flexible scheme for incorporating dependencies on multiple halo properties in the context of halo occupation distribution models.…”
Section: Choice Of Stellar Mass Proxymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that vacc or v peak were best able to reproduce clustering statistics when modelling a sample of SDSS galaxies with M * > 10 10 M . More recently, Lehmann et al (2015) have shown that stellar content likely depends not just on halo mass but also concentration, while Hearin et al (2016) have developed a flexible scheme for incorporating dependencies on multiple halo properties in the context of halo occupation distribution models.…”
Section: Choice Of Stellar Mass Proxymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, average SFHs can be inferred by integrating the main sequence SFR over time (e.g., Leitner 2012), but this approach leads to inconsistencies (Leja et al 2015). Instead, the most successful theoretical models link the growth of stellar mass to the growth of the dark matter halos that galaxies inhabit, for example, via subhalo abundance matching (e.g., Kravtsov et al 2004;Conroy et al 2006;Behroozi et al 2013b;Moster et al 2013), halo occupation distributions (e.g., Peacock & Smith 2000;Seljak 2000;Hearin et al 2016), semianalytic models (Kauffmann et al 1993;Somerville et al 2001;Guo et al 2011), or other assumptions (Bouché et al 2010;Davé et al 2012;Lilly et al 2013;Tacchella et al 2013;Mitra et al 2017). One important conclusion from these models is that there has to be significant scatter between halo and galaxy masses (and thus growth histories) in order to explain observations (More et al 2009;Behroozi et al 2013b;Reddick et al 2013;Gu et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the observable property is a count of galaxies above some size (luminosity, stellar mass, etc.) threshold, the MPR is analogous to the Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD, Berlind & Weinberg 2002;Cooray & Sheth 2002;Hearin et al 2013;Zentner et al 2014;Hearin et al 2016;Zehavi et al 2018). The stellar property statistics of dark matter halos lie within the broad category of the "galaxyhalo connection" which was reviewed recently by Wechsler & Tinker (2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%