The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic tradeoff between kinetic and energetic efficiencies in membrane capacitive deionization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
60
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some commonly used energy, throughput, and materials metrics in CDI are: the salt adsorption capacity (SAC, in mg/g of electrodes), average salt adsorption rate (ASAR, in mol/min/cm 2 or in mg/g/min), [13][14][15][16][17] energy consumption per mole of salt removed (in kJ/mol kJ/g, or kT /ion), [18][19][20][21] energy normalized adsorbed salt (ENAS, in µmol/J), 15,16,22 and specific energy consumption (SEC, in mg/J). 17,20 While these metrics may be insightful for the processes relevant to CDI, it would be beneficial to settle upon a minimumnecessary set of measures that reflect economically relevant desalination performance. Additionally, it is important to distinguish between throughput and energy consumption, as these different desalination aspects often trade off with one another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some commonly used energy, throughput, and materials metrics in CDI are: the salt adsorption capacity (SAC, in mg/g of electrodes), average salt adsorption rate (ASAR, in mol/min/cm 2 or in mg/g/min), [13][14][15][16][17] energy consumption per mole of salt removed (in kJ/mol kJ/g, or kT /ion), [18][19][20][21] energy normalized adsorbed salt (ENAS, in µmol/J), 15,16,22 and specific energy consumption (SEC, in mg/J). 17,20 While these metrics may be insightful for the processes relevant to CDI, it would be beneficial to settle upon a minimumnecessary set of measures that reflect economically relevant desalination performance. Additionally, it is important to distinguish between throughput and energy consumption, as these different desalination aspects often trade off with one another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrical SEC of pervaporation technology indicated a value < 0.3 kWh/m 3 , but a considerable thermal energy was required for heating and maintaining the feed stream [12]. Various models suggested have shown that CDI could operate with a SEC of less than 1 kWh/m 3 for low-salinity brackish water but remains less energy-efficient than RO [13][14][15]. In a pilot 1-kW photovoltaic (PV)-powered membrane CDI system for treating 6700-µS/cm brackish water, the system exhibited a low SEC (the sum of battery, pump and power supply associated with an electrode) in the range of 0.7-1.1 kWh/m 3 for producing 5-m 3 /d potable water [16].…”
Section: Introduction 1water Scarcitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a critical problem to find the trade‐off relationship between desalination performance and energy efficiency for the multi‐cells in the adsorption/desorption process. [ 30 ] So far, the impacts of the desalination processes with different assembling mode on the desalination performance and energy consumption have not been systematically reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%