2017
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1602306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic paleointensity bias and the long-term history of the geodynamo

Abstract: A key mechanism responsible for a systematic bias in the global geomagnetic paleointensity database.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low-temperature demagnetization appears to be unable to fully remove the effects of a previous AFimpressed anisotropy. This observation is consistent with findings by Smirnov et al [2017], who state that LTD can be inefficient if grains are oxidized, or due to pinning of walls at exsolution boundaries or lattice defects.…”
Section: Changes In Ams During Af Demagnetization and Low-temperaturesupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Low-temperature demagnetization appears to be unable to fully remove the effects of a previous AFimpressed anisotropy. This observation is consistent with findings by Smirnov et al [2017], who state that LTD can be inefficient if grains are oxidized, or due to pinning of walls at exsolution boundaries or lattice defects.…”
Section: Changes In Ams During Af Demagnetization and Low-temperaturesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This observation is consistent with findings by Smirnov et al . [], who state that LTD can be inefficient if grains are oxidized, or due to pinning of walls at exsolution boundaries or lattice defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MD criterion addresses a fundamental requirement of the Thellier method that the paleointensity signal should ideally be carried by noninteracting single‐domain magnetic grains. The presence of strong interactions and/or multidomain‐like behavior of magnetic grains results in nonlinear Arai plots leading to an intrinsic paleointensity bias that becomes more significant with the increasing grain size (Levi, ; Paterson, ; Smirnov et al, ; Xu & Dunlop, ). We have assigned MD = 1 if the absence of a significant MD bias was explicitly demonstrated by the pTRM‐tail check (Riisager & Riisager, ) and/or the Thellier‐IZZI (Tauxe & Staudigel, ) procedures.…”
Section: The Paleointensity Database (Qpi‐pint) For 65–200 Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower temperature section of an Arai plot is commonly used to avoid nonideal behavior that might be caused by alteration at higher temperatures (i.e., Kosterov & Prevot, 1998), but more recent work, e.g., Biggin (2010) and Smirnov et al (2017) has shown that using the low-temperature portion of a concave-up Arai plot from a Thellier-style experiment can lead to large PI overestimations. The lower temperature section of an Arai plot is commonly used to avoid nonideal behavior that might be caused by alteration at higher temperatures (i.e., Kosterov & Prevot, 1998), but more recent work, e.g., Biggin (2010) and Smirnov et al (2017) has shown that using the low-temperature portion of a concave-up Arai plot from a Thellier-style experiment can lead to large PI overestimations.…”
Section: Implications For Thellier-style Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural samples containing grains comparable to the oxyexsolved sample set used here are commonly used in PI experiments, which means that nonideal behavior could cause overestimations in absolute PI values. The lower temperature section of an Arai plot is commonly used to avoid nonideal behavior that might be caused by alteration at higher temperatures (i.e., Kosterov & Prevot, 1998), but more recent work, e.g., Biggin (2010) and Smirnov et al (2017) has shown that using the low-temperature portion of a concave-up Arai plot from a Thellier-style experiment can lead to large PI overestimations. These experiments indicate that the majority of the nonideal behavior occurs in the low-temperature portion of the Arai plot.…”
Section: Implications For Thellier-style Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%