2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6cp07184h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic magnetism and spontaneous band gap opening in bilayer silicene and germanene

Abstract: It has been long sought to create magnetism out of simple non-magnetic materials, such as silicon and germanium. Here we show that intrinsic magnetism exists in bilayer silicene and germanene with no need to cut, etch, or dope. Unlike bilayer graphene, strong covalent interlayer bonding formed in bilayer silicene and germanene breaks the original π-bonding network of each layer, leaving the unbonded electrons unpaired and localized to carry magnetic moments. These magnetic moments then couple ferromagnetically… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Silicene spintronics has become a vast field of theoretical research 20 with applications exemplified by an ideal spin filter 21 . FM order in silicene sheets is predicted to arise as long as they are asymmetrically functionalized as in partially hydrogenated 22 and bilayer 23 silicene. However, the high reactivity of silicene poses considerable difficulties to any experimentation: free-standing silicene is yet to be demonstrated and only one silicene-based device of note is reported to date 24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silicene spintronics has become a vast field of theoretical research 20 with applications exemplified by an ideal spin filter 21 . FM order in silicene sheets is predicted to arise as long as they are asymmetrically functionalized as in partially hydrogenated 22 and bilayer 23 silicene. However, the high reactivity of silicene poses considerable difficulties to any experimentation: free-standing silicene is yet to be demonstrated and only one silicene-based device of note is reported to date 24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5(c)) and [n v and n v ↓1 + 2] (purple and red curves). Here, the n v = 10 (n v = 12) LLs acquire a side mode of 12 (10), leading to the anti-crossings for (n v ↑1 = 10 and n v ↓2 = 12) and (n v ↑2 = 10 and n v ↓1 = 12) LLs, as indicated by the blue circle in Fig. 5(c The DOS of the conduction LLs presents the ordering of n c ↓2 -, n c ↓1 -, n c ↑1 -and n c ↑2 -dominated peaks (green, red, blue and purple in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the most widely investigated material, graphene (monolayer of sp 2 carbon), there are a host of 2D materials that have garnered interest, including transition metal dichalcogenide (MX 2 ), MXene (M n+1 AX n ), silicene, phosphorene (i.e., black phosphorous), and germanene. Table 1 summarizes the typical electronic properties (bandgap (eV) [27][28][29][30][31][32] and work function (eV)), [33][34][35][36][37][38] structural property (bond length (Å)), [39][40][41][42][43][44] transport properties (electrical conductivity (S cm −1 ) [45][46][47][48][49][50] and thermal conductivity (W m −1 K −1 ) [51][52][53][54][55] ), mechanical in-plane stiffness (Young's modulus (GPa) [56][57][58][59][60][61] ), and surface energy (mJ m −2 ) [62][63][64][65][66] of these representative 2D materials.…”
Section: Physical Properties and Attractive Features Of 2d Materials mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mater. 2020, 32,1907006 [28] ≈1.80 (Sc 2 CO 2 ) [28] ≈0.88 (Zr 2 CO 2 ) [28] ≈1.0 (Hf 2 CO 2 ) [28] ≈1.27 (ML) [29] ≈0.55 (BL) [30] ≈1.88 (ML) [31] 0 (ML) [32] ≈0.05 (BL) [32] Work function a) [Φ, eV] ≈4.5 ≈5.1 (ML, BL, MoS 2 ) [33,34] ≈4.3 (ML, WS 2 ) [34] ≈4.6 (ML, WSe 2 ) [34] ≈4.37 (Ti 3 C 2 T X ) [35] ≈3.35 (Sc10C9) [36] ≈4.76 [37] ≈5.16 (ML) [38] ≈4.56 (FL) [38] 4.66 [37] Bond length [Å] 1.42 (C-C) ≈3.15-4.03 [39] ≈2.10 (Ti-C) [40] ≈1.99 (Ti-O) [41] ≈2.15 (Ti-F) [41] ≈2.25 (Si-Si) [42] ≈2.22 (P-P) [43] 2.49-2.56 (Ge-Ge) [44] Electroconductivity [S cm −1 ] ≈10 6 [45] ≈5.0 (MoS 2 ) [46] ≈10 4 [47] 6.5 kΩ b) [48] ≈300 (with graphene) [49] ≈10 5 [50] Thermal conductivity [W m −1 K −1 ] 5300 [51] ≈19.5 (MoS 2 ) [46] ≈55.2 (Ti 3 C 2 T X ) [52] ≈16 [53,54] 2000-5000 [55] ≈15.95 [54] Young's modulus [GPa] ≈1000 [56] ≈270 (MoS 2 ) [57] ≈330 ± 30 (Ti 3 C 2 T X ) [58] ≈82...…”
Section: Fibers (1d)mentioning
confidence: 99%