2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic functional connectivity predicts individual differences in distractibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual differences with regard to connectivity19, cognitive function34, cognition35 and clinical symptoms36 have also been explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual differences with regard to connectivity19, cognitive function34, cognition35 and clinical symptoms36 have also been explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater connectivity between default mode regions predicted better distractor suppression, supporting evidence of compromised default network function in a variety of clinical disorders [47,78]. Greater connectivity between the default mode and the dorsal and ventral attention networks, on the other hand, predicted worse distractor suppression, reinforcing previous findings that diminished anticorrelation between the task-positive and task-negative networks is related to impaired attention [40,78]. These support vector regression models were internally validated with a leave-one-subject-out approach; however, they were not tested for external validity beyond the study sample.…”
Section: New Insights From Network Neuroscience and Predictive Modelingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…One study, for example, found that resting-state connectivity between the dorsal and ventral attention and default networks predicted the ability to suppress irrelevant visual distractors measured several months later [78]. Greater connectivity between default mode regions predicted better distractor suppression, supporting evidence of compromised default network function in a variety of clinical disorders [47,78].…”
Section: New Insights From Network Neuroscience and Predictive Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrasted to activation analyses, functional connectivity takes into account the entire task time series, and are modelā€free, capturing cofluctuations in activity not captured by extrinsic events in modelā€based activation analyses (Gonzalezā€Castillo etĀ al., 2012). Recent studies using functional connectivity analyses suggest that this approach is sensitive to Iā€ELT (Philip etĀ al., 2013; Philip etĀ al., 2014), as well as individual differences in anxiety, intelligence, cognitive ability, and ADHD symptoms (Finn etĀ al., 2015; Fortenbaugh, DeGutis, & Esterman, in press; Kim etĀ al., 2011; Poole etĀ al., 2016; Rosenberg etĀ al., 2016). This approach may thus reveal previously unobserved brainā€“behavior associations that are relevant to our understanding of cognition and psychopathology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%