1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(05)80047-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intravascular stenting of traumatic abdominal aortic dissection

Abstract: Intravascular stenting allowed treatment of the dissection without open surgical procedures requiring laparotomy and aortic operation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
24
0
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Endovascular treatment has proven to be a successful advancement in the management of vascular trauma. Numerous case reports established the efficiency of endovascular management in blunt aortic injury since the first report of successful endovascular repair of a traumatic abdominal aortic dissection by Marty-Ane et al in 1996 [20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endovascular treatment has proven to be a successful advancement in the management of vascular trauma. Numerous case reports established the efficiency of endovascular management in blunt aortic injury since the first report of successful endovascular repair of a traumatic abdominal aortic dissection by Marty-Ane et al in 1996 [20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a bare metal stent rather than a stent graft was preferred as it was considered that a stent, apart from fixing the dissection flap and restoring the true lumen in the abdominal aorta and right common iliac artery, would also preserve important collaterals, such as the inferior mesenteric, the median sacral, and the lumbar arteries. 13 Another advantage is that the bare metal stent delivery system requires only a 6F sheath, much smaller than that necessary for the same-diameter stent grafts. This is an important factor to take into consideration when embarking on endovascular interventions in young children with small-diameter iliac arteries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 These techniques are intuitively advantageous for the hemodynamically stable patient and for those with contaminating intra-abdominal injuries but may be less attractive in cases of complete aortic thrombosis or in children with underdeveloped vascular systems. Still, reconstruction of the immature aorta remains complicated by technical constrains of the narrowed vessel caliber and the uncertain impact of repair with prosthetic conduits and or endovascular grafts through growth and development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%