2022
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00015-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrauterine device-related uterine perforation incidence and risk (APEX-IUD): a large multisite cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The patient we present did not have the IUD inserted in the following six months after delivery nor she was breastfeeding at the time of the insertion, which are factors found to increase the risk of uterine perforation by IUD [ 9 - 12 ]. The only possible risk factor in her case was uterine retroversion and retroflexion as it has been reported that 42% of perforations occur in retroverted uteri [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient we present did not have the IUD inserted in the following six months after delivery nor she was breastfeeding at the time of the insertion, which are factors found to increase the risk of uterine perforation by IUD [ 9 - 12 ]. The only possible risk factor in her case was uterine retroversion and retroflexion as it has been reported that 42% of perforations occur in retroverted uteri [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra-cesarean placement also avoids a potentially more difficult insertion through a narrowed endocervical canal weeks after birth and, at times, a challenging position of the uterus, particularly after repeated cesareans [ 15 ]. The authors of a recent, large multisite cohort study examined the risk of uterine perforation with IUD insertion and observed complete perforations at their highest rates 4 days to 6 weeks postpartum, whereas none was diagnosed following insertion between within 3 days postpartum [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study design and validation of variable selection have been described in detail previously. 13 , 16 , 17 Approval or exemption for the conduct of this study was provided by the IRBs of Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Kaiser Permanente Washington, and Regenstrief Institute; Kaiser Permanente Southern California also received approval from California state agencies for the use of vital statistics data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 , 3 , 4 , 6 – 11 The APEX-IUD (Association of Perforation and EXpulsion of IntraUterine Devices) study was an observational cohort study of 326,658 individuals designed to assess the association of breastfeeding and timing of postpartum IUD insertion with IUD expulsion and IUD-related uterine perforation among individuals in the United States. 12 , 13 The study also evaluated risks of IUD expulsion and uterine perforation in individuals with heavy menstrual bleeding and by IUD type (copper IUDs vs levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems [LNG-IUDs]). 14 , 15 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%