Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a disease of multifactorial etiology. Quantifying the burden of SLE across different countries can clarify the role of genetic, environmental and other causative factors in the natural history of the disease, and to understand its clinical and societal consequences. The aim of this study is to summarize data on SLE incidence and prevalence in the USA, Europe, Asia, and Australia. An extensive review of electronic resources (PubMed and MedLine) and medical journals was conducted to identify published studies on SLE incidence and prevalence over the period of 1950-early 2006. Researchers in the countries of interest provided additional information on the epidemiology of SLE. The incidence and prevalence of SLE varies considerably across the countries. The burden of the disease is considerably elevated among non-white racial groups. There is a trend towards higher incidence and prevalence of SLE in Europe and Australia compared to the U.S.A. In Europe, the highest prevalence was reported in Sweden, Iceland and Spain. There are marked disparities in SLE rates worldwide. This variability may reflect true differences across populations, or result from methodological differences of studies. The true geographic, racial, and temporal differences in SLE incidence and prevalence may yield important clues to the etiology of disease.
Mortality risk among hemodialysis (HD) patients may be highest soon after initiation of HD. A period of elevated mortality risk was identified among US incident HD patients, and which patient characteristics predict death during this period and throughout the first year was examined using data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS; 1996 through 2004). A retrospective cohort study design was used to identify mortality risk factors. All patient information was collected at enrollment. Life-table analyses and discrete logistic regression were used to identify a period of elevated mortality risk. Cox regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) measuring associations between patient characteristics and mortality and to examine whether these associations changed during the first year of HD. (1), and a higher mortality rate within the first year after initiation of HD has been described (2). Identifying the period of highest risk for death after initiation of HD and factors that are associated with this higher risk are important to the care of patients who are new to HD (incident). Observational studies among prevalent HD patients have identified patient characteristics that are associated with greater mortality risk, including white race, older age, low serum albumin levels, low and elevated serum phosphorus levels, anemia, and cardiovascular disease (traditional risk factors) (3-14), as well as other nontraditional risk factors, including C-reactive protein and IL-6 levels (15,16). Studies also have supported the importance of early nephrology referral in the predialysis period for reducing mortality after HD initiation (17)(18)(19). Because these studies typically have included prevalent rather than incident patients, only limited information is available concerning mortality rates and factors that influence mortality immediately after HD initiation. One reason for this may be the 90-d Medicare entitlement period (coordination of benefits) during which coverage is not guaranteed (1). The few studies that have assessed mortality rates or risk predictors in the period immediately after HD initiation (2,20 -24) suggest an elevated mortality risk in the first 90 d, but it is unclear whether that elevation is limited to the first 90 d. One population-based study (2) found that 6% of HD patients died within the first 90 d, accounting for nearly 35% of deaths within the first year.Studies that quantify mortality rates and identify mortality predictors among incident HD populations are useful for understanding the influence of predialysis care and length of time on dialysis. Data from the 2004 Annual Dialysis Report (1) indicate higher mortality rates for patients who have received HD for Ͼ5 yr as compared with Ͻ2 yr, suggesting that length of time on HD modifies mortality risk. Most patients begin HD
Objectives To examine the association between strength, function, lean mass, muscle density and risk of hospitalization. Design Prospective cohort stud Setting Two U.S. clinical centers Participants Adults aged 70 – 80 years (N=3,011) from the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Measurements Measures included grip strength; knee extension strength; lean mass; walking speed; chair stand pace. Thigh computed tomography scans assessed muscle area and density (a proxy for muscle fat infiltration). Hospitalizations were confirmed by local review of medical records. Negative binomial regression models estimated incident rate ratios (IRRs) of hospitalization for race/sex specific quartiles of each muscle/function parameter separately. Multivariate models adjusted for age, body mass index, health status and coexisting medical conditions. Results During an average 4.7 years of follow-up, 1,678 (55.7%) participants experienced ≥1 hospitalization. Participants in the lowest quartile of muscle density were more likely to be subsequently hospitalized (multivariate IRR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.73) compared to the highest quartile. Similarly, participants with the weakest grip strength were at increased risk of hospitalization (MIRR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.30, 1.78, Q1 vs. Q4). Comparable results were seen for knee strength, walking pace and chair stands pace. Lean mass and muscle area were not associated with risk of hospitalization. Conclusion Weak strength, poor function and low muscle density, but not muscle size or lean mass, were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization. Interventions to reduce the disease burden associated with sarcopenia should focus on increasing muscle strength and improving physical function rather than simply increasing lean mass.
Although the beneficial effects of dietary soybean protein compared with animal proteins on plasma lipids, lipoproteins and atherosclerosis have been known for about 50 years, it has been uncertain whether these effects are due to its amino acid concentrations or other components in soybeans. To assess the effect of soybean protein's alcohol-extractable components (including the isoflavonic phytoestrogens genistein and daidzein) on plasma lipid and lipoprotein concentrations and to establish its lack of effect on the reproductive system, we fed 27 peripubertal male and female rhesus monkeys moderately atherogenic diets in which the source of dietary protein was a soy isolate (20% by weight), either containing phytoestrogens (also termed isoflavones) or with the phytoestrogens removed by alcohol extraction. The study was a crossover design with each period lasting for 6 mo. The phytoestrogen-intact soy protein (compared with the alcohol-extracted soy protein) had favorable effects on plasma lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, specifically by significantly reducing LDL+VLDL cholesterol concentrations in both males and females (approximately 30-40% lower), significantly increasing high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) concentrations for females (approximately 15% higher) and significantly lowering total plasma cholesterol (TPC):HDLC ratios (approximately 20% lower for males and 50% lower for females). The phytoestrogens had no adverse effects on the reproductive systems of either the males or females, as evaluated by reproductive hormone concentrations and organ weights at necropsy. Thus, the isoflavones in soy protein improve cardiovascular disease risk factors without apparent deleterious effects on the reproductive system of peripubertal rhesus monkeys.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.