2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-006-0156-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intratympanic membrane cholesteatoma: a rare incidental finding

Abstract: Intratympanic membrane cholesteatoma, occurring in the absence of trauma or surgery to the ear, is rare with less than 20 cases reported in the literature. We report a rare incidental finding of intratympanic membrane cholesteatoma in a 12-month-old girl and review the literature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intratympanic membrane cholesteatoma without any adverse events, such as our two cases, can be considered of congenital origin [2,5,7,10]. However, the true cause of this lesion is still unknown because the pathogenesis of congenital cholesteatoma in the middle ear is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Intratympanic membrane cholesteatoma without any adverse events, such as our two cases, can be considered of congenital origin [2,5,7,10]. However, the true cause of this lesion is still unknown because the pathogenesis of congenital cholesteatoma in the middle ear is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Intratympanic membrane cholesteatoma without any adverse events in the middle ear or on the tympanic membrane has been detected as an incidental finding on routine examination of the ear [7]. Therefore, not only otolaryngologists but also pediatricians and primary care physicians should routinely perform otoscopy on every child in order to screen for this lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2 summarizes the data found in the English literature [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%