1997
DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199709000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrathecal Fentanyl With Small-Dose Dilute Bupivacaine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
58
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Fentanyl is widely used to increase the duration of analgesia without increasing the duration of motor block, and to reduce required local anesthetic dosage [24]. Choi et al [25] reported that the combination of 8 mg bupivacaine and 10 μg fentanyl is as efficient as 12 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fentanyl is widely used to increase the duration of analgesia without increasing the duration of motor block, and to reduce required local anesthetic dosage [24]. Choi et al [25] reported that the combination of 8 mg bupivacaine and 10 μg fentanyl is as efficient as 12 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 However, numerous recent studies have reported that a combination of opioids and local anesthetics permits the local anesthetic dose to be significantly reduced. 20,21 The combined spinalepidural technique has gained increasing popularity because of its selected advantages of both spinal and epidural anesthesia. 22 It provides the rapid onset and dense block of spinal analgesia, and combined epidural injection functions as a back-up for an inadequate spinal surgical block and even offers extended duration of epidural anesthesia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6] Using this information, power analysis was calculated using the statistical package Stata ® /IC 12.1 (StataCorp, USA), that 18 patients would be needed in each group at an alpha level of 0.05 and a beta value of 0.90 to detect this difference. We decided to enrol 20 patients in each group to minimise the possibility of a beta error.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%