2014
DOI: 10.1111/bij.12256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraspecific variation inAegla longirostri(Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura) revealed by geometric morphometrics: evidence for ongoing speciation?

Abstract: Genetic divergences among populations of Aegla longirostri suggest that this group may be formed by cryptic species. In this study, we analysed the carapace shape of six populations of A. longirostri from southern Brazil, using a geometric morphometric approach, to better elucidate the species' systematics. Our results were congruent with the genetic data, meaning that genetically differentiated populations were also morphogeometrically differentiated. The geometric morphometric descriptors showed significant … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also be taken into account that many aeglid species present a narrow distribution, and two species with a relatively wide distribution, Aegla longirostri Bond-Buckup & Buckup, 1994 and Aegla platensis, may represent a complex of cryptic species as supported by genetic and morphogeometric evidence (BartholomeiSantos et al, 2011;Marchiori et al, 2014;2015). If this is true, so the distribution area of each cryptic species will be narrower than the "grouped" species, which can result in different conservation status for each cryptic species, the reason for which data were considered deficient for these two current recognized species.…”
Section: Diversity and Conservation Of Aeglidaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be taken into account that many aeglid species present a narrow distribution, and two species with a relatively wide distribution, Aegla longirostri Bond-Buckup & Buckup, 1994 and Aegla platensis, may represent a complex of cryptic species as supported by genetic and morphogeometric evidence (BartholomeiSantos et al, 2011;Marchiori et al, 2014;2015). If this is true, so the distribution area of each cryptic species will be narrower than the "grouped" species, which can result in different conservation status for each cryptic species, the reason for which data were considered deficient for these two current recognized species.…”
Section: Diversity and Conservation Of Aeglidaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Albeit variation in population parameters is expected, and sampling methods can bias the results, the differences between UB and GB are very marked, eventually presenting differences of over 100% in certain values. If we consider the geographical isolation between the two river basins (SCHWARZBOLD 2010), alongside the evidences for ecological differences, it becomes clear that molecular studies might be the best choice to elucidate if this is a case of ecological differences between populations, or if this a case of cryptic species (MARCHIORI et al 2014).…”
Section: Bond-buckupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, ; Marchiori et al . ). However, it is not known whether river networks and mountains ranges with complex topography impact the phylogeography of inland true freshwater crabs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%