2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aspen.2014.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraspecific and interspecific aggressive interactions between two species of fire ants, Solenopsis geminata and S. invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the "invaded" populations used in this study are within both the invasive range of Solenopsis invicta and the historic distribution of the native fire ants Solenopsis geminata and Solenopsis xyloni (Tschinkel 2006). While S. invicta likely impose a stronger selective pressure than the native fire ants due to their more potent venom (Tschinkel 2006), higher densities (Porter et al 1988), and more aggressive attack than native fire ant species (Lai et al 2015), it is possible that the prior exposure to native fire ants contributes to the observed differences between invaded and uninvaded populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the "invaded" populations used in this study are within both the invasive range of Solenopsis invicta and the historic distribution of the native fire ants Solenopsis geminata and Solenopsis xyloni (Tschinkel 2006). While S. invicta likely impose a stronger selective pressure than the native fire ants due to their more potent venom (Tschinkel 2006), higher densities (Porter et al 1988), and more aggressive attack than native fire ant species (Lai et al 2015), it is possible that the prior exposure to native fire ants contributes to the observed differences between invaded and uninvaded populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When moving the queen between subcolonies, we recorded worker behaviour towards the queen every 10 minutes for 1 hour and recorded the queen's position within the colony box after 24h. We scored behaviour toward the queen according to Lai et al (2015) [35] as: 0 ignoring, touching, 2 avoiding, 3 holding, 4 aggression, and 5 fighting. At day 120 for all but the six queenless subcolonies with the most workers, we dissected the ovaries of 15 workers selected haphazardly among all the remaining workers, or all the workers if the subcolony was smaller than 15 workers.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We placed one O. smaragdina worker on one side and three A. gracilipes workers on the other side and let the ants acclimatize for five minutes before removing the dividing wall. For the first five minutes, we noted the highest aggression score between the two species at 30s intervals according to the method used in Lai et al (2015) [35] and described above. We then checked the arena every minutes for the remaining 55 minutes and recorded whether O. smaragdina or A. gracilipes workers had died.…”
Section: Aggression Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of studies also revealed that S. invicta better responds to habitat disturbance than S. geminata (Plowes et al, 2007;LeBrun et al, 2012;Axen et al, 2014) and displays higher potential of dispersal than S. geminata, being able to engage in mating flights earlier in the season (Tschinkel, 2006) and to produce larger colonies on average (Trible et al, 2018). Finally, S. invicta outcompetes S. geminata at food sites (Morrison, 2000), experiences lower mortality during interspecific aggressive interactions (Lai et al, 2015), and quickly responds to the loss of the functional queen with dealation among female sexuals and onset of egg-laying (Vargo and Porter, 1993), a mechanism of developmental plasticity that S. geminata lacks.…”
Section: Fire Antsmentioning
confidence: 99%