2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3596-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irresistible ants: exposure to novel toxic prey increases consumption over multiple temporal scales

Abstract: As species become increasingly exposed to novel challenges, it is critical to understand how evolutionary (i.e., generational) and plastic (i.e., within lifetime) responses work together to determine a species' fate or predict its distribution. The introduction of non-native species imposes novel pressures on the native species that they encounter. Understanding how native species exposed to toxic or distasteful invaders change their feeding behavior can provide insight into their ability to cope with these no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a subsequent study, sub-adult lizards did not avoid toxic ants after direct exposure, after six months (exposed as juveniles), or when they were sourced from a population invaded by fire ants for generations. Similar to the previous study, sub-adult lizards increased ant consumption during the course of the experiment (Herr et al, 2016). A third study used lab-born hatchling fence lizards to test fire ant avoidance behaviour.…”
Section: Lizardsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In a subsequent study, sub-adult lizards did not avoid toxic ants after direct exposure, after six months (exposed as juveniles), or when they were sourced from a population invaded by fire ants for generations. Similar to the previous study, sub-adult lizards increased ant consumption during the course of the experiment (Herr et al, 2016). A third study used lab-born hatchling fence lizards to test fire ant avoidance behaviour.…”
Section: Lizardsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Since adults have been exposed to fire ants for their entire lifetimes (likely frequently over several years) they may have learned that consuming fire ants is noxious or painful and thus learned to avoid them. However, these lizards increase consumption of fire ants with repeated exposure, arguing against learned avoidance (Robbins et al 2013;Herr et al 2016). The hatchlings were fire ant naïve and did not have had the opportunity to learn to avoid fire ants.…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This innate avoidance suggests selective pressure to avoid eating these toxic ants. However, sub-adult fence lizards increased consumption of fire ants with increased exposure across multiple contexts (multigenerational, distant past, and recent exposure; Robbins et al 2013;Herr et al 2016). In all of these experiments, lizards were presented with fire ants as their only prey option, meaning their ability to distinguish fire ants from native ants, a key assumption, has not been tested.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Red imported fire ants are venomous, and as few as 12 fire ants are capable of killing a fence lizard (Langkilde, 2009b). Fire ants also serve as a novel prey item for fence lizards and envenomate the lizards even as they are consumed (Herr et al, 2016; Venable & Langkilde, 2019; Venable et al, 2019). In addition to sharing a broad geographic range, fence lizards and fire ants occupy open, anthropogenically disturbed habitats, resulting in frequent interactions between the two species (Langkilde, 2009a, 2009b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fire ants also serve as a novel prey item for fence lizards and envenomate the lizards even as they are consumed (Herr et al, 2016;. In addition to sharing a broad geographic range, fence lizards and fire ants occupy open, anthropogenically disturbed habitats, resulting in frequent interactions between the two species (Langkilde, 2009a(Langkilde, , 2009b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%