2017
DOI: 10.2500/ar.2017.8.0189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrasinus Penetration of a Silastic Malar Implant, which Resulted in Chronic Sinusitis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Abstract: Background:Malar augmentation is a common cosmetic procedure utilizing silastic materials. We describe an uncommon complication of a silastic implant eroding into the anterior maxillary sinus wall resulting in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).Methods:A literature review is presented describing the presentation, surgical management and outcome of this uncommon adverse event.Results:An 80 year old female with a history of bilateral cosmetic malar implants placed approximately 25 years ago presented to our office wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…complicates the use of the conservative alternatives described. Precedent reports have found foreign body removal as the more appropriate treatment in such cases [6]. Although previous case analyses have recognized this complication to occur in a delayed fashion, greater than one to two decades post-operative, this case described is unique in that the patient presented with intrasinus migration four years subsequent to implant placement [6][7][8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…complicates the use of the conservative alternatives described. Precedent reports have found foreign body removal as the more appropriate treatment in such cases [6]. Although previous case analyses have recognized this complication to occur in a delayed fashion, greater than one to two decades post-operative, this case described is unique in that the patient presented with intrasinus migration four years subsequent to implant placement [6][7][8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%