Intrarater reliability of different methods of heart rate variability threshold analysis and postexercise parasympathetic reactivation in young women

Abstract

To evaluate the reliability of HRVT and postexercise parasympathetic reactivation analysis after a submaximal exercise test in young women. Methods: Twenty-four young women [21.1 (20.1, 24.7) years; 21.4 (20.1, 23.1) kg/m 2 ] underwent three incremental exercise tests on a treadmill on occasions separated by 48 h. R-R intervals were continuously recorded during the incremental tests and throughout 5 min of post-exercise active recovery for HRVT and parasympathetic reactivation analysis, respectively. HRVT was identified using two methods: a) the intensity where no significant reduction of SD1 HRV index was identified by visual inspection of the graphic (HRVT visual ), b) the first stage to present SD1 value < 3ms (HRVT 3ms ). Postexercise parasympathetic reactivation was assessed at each minute during five minutes of recovery using SD1 and r-MSSD indexes. Absolute and relative reliability were assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Results: Good (ICC = 0.81, CV = 17.3) and excellent (ICC = 0.90, CV = 4.6) reliability were observed for HRVT 3ms and HRVT visual , respectively. On the postexercise period, good reliability was observed for both SD1 (ICC = 0.82-89, CV = 22.1-28.9) and r-MSSD (ICC = 0.82-89, CV = 21.1-28.6), with a high correlation between indexes in all-time points of analysis (r = 0.96-0.99). Conclusions: HRVT may be reproducibly assessed in women, mainly when HRVT visual is used for analysis. In addition, SD1 and r-MSSD provide reliable and redundant measures of postexercise parasympathetic reactivation.