2011
DOI: 10.3354/meps09395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrapopulation variations in diet and habitat use in a marine apex predator, the broadnose sevengill shark Notorynchus cepedianus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of an ontogenetic relationship between the size of bull sharks and δ 15 N was, however, in contrast to some of these studies [16,22,70]. This was most likely due to the limited size range of individuals sampled in this study and the absence of juveniles from the study site.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lack of an ontogenetic relationship between the size of bull sharks and δ 15 N was, however, in contrast to some of these studies [16,22,70]. This was most likely due to the limited size range of individuals sampled in this study and the absence of juveniles from the study site.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…The relatively slow isotopic turnover rate of elasmobranch muscle tissue [13] may also mean that sharks foraging between different habitats will not reach isotopic equilibrium with one habitat which makes the interpretation of these data difficult. This may mean that the isotopic signatures reflected by these muscle tissues are in fact a mix of the dietary contributions from all frequented habitats [22] and may not reflect specific dietary contributions from the study site. However, these signatures may still provide a relative measure between individual bull sharks that reflect the differences between foraging ranges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although stable isotopes have been successfully used in shark species to examine animal origin and movement (e.g. Abrantes & Barnett 2011, it is very difficult to work at a scale of < 6 mo (minimum turnover time for the plasma), especially if the difference in isotopic values related to trophic shift is small.…”
Section: Caveats In Applying Stable Isotopes In the Study Of Sharksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the similar distributions of S. acanthias and M. antarcticus, the diVerence in diet between the two species suggests they show some degree of resource partitioning, and they may forage in diVerent habitats. Stable isotope analysis also suggests that S. acanthias feeds on slightly higher trophic level prey than M. antarcticus in the Derwent River and Norfolk Bay (Abrantes and Barnett 2011). The large amounts of sedentary prey consumed by M. antarcticus, in conjunction with their constant feeding (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%