2022
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraocular Pressure Measurement after Penetrating Keratoplasty

Abstract: Assessing the intraocular pressure is a difficult but crucial task in the follow-up of patients that have undergone penetrating keratoplasty. Early recognition of elevated intraocular pressure and/or glaucoma and establishment of the appropriate treatment is essential to ensure the best possible visual outcome for patients dealing with this feared complication. Although Goldmann applanation tonometry is still the gold standard for measuring the intraocular pressure, its limitations in postkeratoplasty eyes, du… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(154 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because, after penetrating keratoplasty, it is difficult to assess the severity and progression of glaucoma using conventional methods (clinical examination of the optic nerve and of the nerve fiber layers, automated perimetry, and optical coherence tomography) because of the partial or total opacification of the corneal graft and a low visual acuity. In these situations, IOP is one of the few objective parameters that can be used for follow-up, although even IOP measurement is subject to many sources of error [14]. Our results are comparable to those of other studies that evaluate the IOP-lowering efficiency of MP-TSCPC, both in patients post PK and in other clinical settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This is because, after penetrating keratoplasty, it is difficult to assess the severity and progression of glaucoma using conventional methods (clinical examination of the optic nerve and of the nerve fiber layers, automated perimetry, and optical coherence tomography) because of the partial or total opacification of the corneal graft and a low visual acuity. In these situations, IOP is one of the few objective parameters that can be used for follow-up, although even IOP measurement is subject to many sources of error [14]. Our results are comparable to those of other studies that evaluate the IOP-lowering efficiency of MP-TSCPC, both in patients post PK and in other clinical settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…8 c. On the contrary, for a misaligned button, the suture tensions could vary based on their location, as illustrated in Fig. 8 d, resulting in post-PK complications in refractive errors 44 and intraocular pressure measurement 45 , 46 as reported in the literature.
Figure 8 ( a ) Representation of post PK cornea with sutures, ( b ) fracture toughness in trouser tear mode mapped onto the human cornea, ( c ) ideal PK condition with sutures, and ( d ) when the location of PK is offset in one direction.
…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (PDCT), Tono-Pen, ocular response analyzer (ORA), and the iCare all appear to correlate well with, though tend to overestimate, GAT measurements in post-penetrating keratoplasty eyes [23]. PDCT has shown to be minimally affected by central corneal thickness (CCT) or corneal astigmatism, the TonoPen has the advantage of requiring only a small area of contact with the cornea, while newer devices such as ORA take into account altered corneal biomechanics [23]. Alternatively, the iCare may be useful for IOP measurement in postpenetrating keratoplasty eyes with corneal edema [24], likely because of the correlation between iCare with CCT and corneal curvature [23].…”
Section: Assessing Intraocular Pressure In Penetrating Keratoplasty Eyesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when the graft is edematous, the IOP may be artificially lowered, potentially leading to false reassurance [22 ]. Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (PDCT), Tono-Pen, ocular response analyzer (ORA), and the iCare all appear to correlate well with, though tend to overestimate, GAT measurements in postpenetrating keratoplasty eyes [23]. PDCT has shown to be minimally affected by central corneal thickness (CCT) or corneal astigmatism, the TonoPen has the advantage of requiring only a small area of contact with the cornea, while newer devices such as ORA take into account altered corneal biomechanics [23].…”
Section: Assessing Intraocular Pressure In Penetrating Keratoplasty Eyesmentioning
confidence: 99%