2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrados strengthening of brick masonry arches with different FRCM composites: Experimental and analytical investigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By analyzing the available publications, it can be noted that existing research are mainly based on systems FRP [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The FRCM strengthening, which include Ruredil X Mesh Gold system, is significantly less common [1][2][3]. Some publications raise issues related to the research of strength and deformation of beams reinforced by this FRCM system [11,12], but not include the effect of the initial beam load.…”
Section: The Analysis Of Existing Research and Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By analyzing the available publications, it can be noted that existing research are mainly based on systems FRP [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The FRCM strengthening, which include Ruredil X Mesh Gold system, is significantly less common [1][2][3]. Some publications raise issues related to the research of strength and deformation of beams reinforced by this FRCM system [11,12], but not include the effect of the initial beam load.…”
Section: The Analysis Of Existing Research and Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…has been analyzed in several papers [14,[28][29][30][31][32]. In References [16][17][18]25], it is shown that the failure load of strengthened arches can be analytically evaluated with the approach of the limit analysis. This requires the knowledge of the fiber debonding strain, i.e., the fibers strain associated with debonding at the fiber-matrix interface.…”
Section: Comparison With Arches Strengthened With Cementitious and Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the specific effectiveness of the strengthening of the composite materials considered in this experimental work can be performed considering the parameter ∆f defined by Equation (1) ( Table 3). ∆f is representative of the strengthening effectiveness of the composite materials even though the collapse of the arches was always associated with the shear force, since the composite materials bonded on the surface of an arch produces an increase in both the flexural and shear capacity of the strengthened cross-sections, as observed in References [17,25]. It can be observed A comparison of the specific effectiveness of the strengthening of the composite materials considered in this experimental work can be performed considering the parameter ∆f defined by Equation (1) ( Table 3).…”
Section: Comparison With Arches Strengthened With Cementitious and Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…should be carefully analyzed and retrofitted in the case proper safety levels are not guaranteed. For generic masonry structures traditional (tie-rods) and modern (FRP) [1,2] T techniques can be used. In particular, out-of-plane modes represent the most vulnerable modes, regardless of the applied load, and therefore they should be analyzed with proper modelling approaches (kinematic [3][4][5], finite element [6][7][8] and rocking [9] analyses).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%