Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions

Werts, Charles E.; Linn, Robert L.; Jöreskog, Karl G.

doi:10.1177/001316447403400104

Cited by 1,329 publications

(774 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

689

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…32 The reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity were examined for the measurement instruments used in the study. Reliability was assessed using composite scale reliability 28,33,34 and average variance extracted. 28,33 Composite scale reliability ranged between 0.77 and 0.95 exceeding the cut-off value of 0.7.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Consumer acceptance of wireless finance

2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

is a Full Professor of Marketing with the Faculty of Technology Management, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands. His main research interests are: new product development, electronic marketing, quality management, (online) marketing research, service marketing and management, relationship marketing and innovation and technology management. He has published more than 40 articles in international journals and has contributed more than 50 papers to conference proceedings. Abstract M-commerce has been heralded repeatedly as the new service frontier of the millennium. Present market reality, however, seems to be less optimistic. Therefore, the current study explores the factors contributing to the adoption of mobile services in a context of wireless finance. The technology acceptance model was used as a point of departure. For this study, perceived cost, system quality and social influence were added to the model, and the latter two displayed significant effects in the empirical research. Moderating effects of the variables age, computer skills, mobile technology readiness and social influence were investigated, all of which proved to be relevant in the context presented. Ko de Ruyter

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Consumer acceptance of wireless finance

2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Values of 0.67, 0.33 and 0.19 are considered to be strong, moderate and respectively weak for the inner model valuation [22]. The R-square have all strong values for the perspectives that are impacted in the final model which proves a pretty stable model.…”

Section: A Optimal Balanced Scorecard (Obsc)mentioning

confidence: 97%

“…As a general rule of thumb, in order to validate the outer model (measurement model), the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) should be greater than 0.5 (Chin, 1998) and Composite reliability higher than 0.6 [22], [23]. Composite reliability is like the reliability of a summated scale and AVE is the variance in the indicators explained by the common factor.…”

Section: A Optimal Balanced Scorecard (Obsc)mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparison between Two Balanced Scorecards: Optimal vs. Kaplan and Norton Model

Morard¹,

Stancu²,

Jeannette³

2015

JOEBM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-This paper compares two Balanced Scorecard models, an optimal construction based on a time-managed approach to identify the evolution of the key contributors to the current organization's strategy and a model based on Kaplan and Norton methodology. Both Balanced Scorecards are generated using financial and non-financial strategic indicators collected directly from the company. The paper proposes a process to construct an optimal structure of a

show abstract

“…These fi t indices seem to suggest that the model has an ' adequate fi t ' to the data, despite the conventional standard of a ' good fi t ' (that is, 2 / DF р 3.0; RMSEA р 0.080; CFI у 0.90; GFI у 0.90 and AGFI у 0.80). 58 -60 The composite reliability (CR), which is analogous to internal reliability, 61 ranged from 0.74 (happiness dimension) to 0.77 (both success and centrality dimensions) and proportion of variance extracted (AVE) ranged from 36.2 per cent (centrality dimension) to 40.2 per cent (happiness dimension). The results seem to show that subscales of materialism displayed an acceptable level of reliability and convergent validity (that is, signifi cant indicator ' s estimated path coeffi cient).…”

Section: Assessing Psychometric Properties Of the Original 18-item 3-mentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-cultural equivalence of materialistic values scale (MVS): An exploratory study between the United States and Thailand

Watchravesringkan

2012

J Target Meas Anal Mark

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Owing to the theoretical and managerial importance of materialism, several attempts have been made to cross-culturally examine Richins and Dawon ' s Materialistic Values Scale (MVS).However, the foreign applicability of the scale remains inconclusive. The current research responded to calls related to the use of reverse-worded items and the development of a shorter version of a single scale that can be cross-culturally applicable by examining Richins and Dawson ' s MVS in two different countries that possess different socioeconomic conditions and cultural values. The United States ( n = 276) and Thailand ( n = 262) were examined through the use of multigroup confi rmatory factor analysis to assess measurement invariance. The fi ndings revealed a reduced 10-item three-factor model of materialism that might be applicable in cross-cultural studies. Implications and future research directions are also addressed.

show abstract

Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions

Abstract: Intraclass correlation reliablity estimates are based on the assumption that the various measures are equivalent. Jöreskog's (1970) general model for the analysis of covariance structures can be used to test the validity of this assumption.

Cited by 1,329 publications

References 6 publications

Consumer acceptance of wireless finance

Consumer acceptance of wireless finance

A Comparison between Two Balanced Scorecards: Optimal vs. Kaplan and Norton Model

Cross-cultural equivalence of materialistic values scale (MVS): An exploratory study between the United States and Thailand

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About