2001
DOI: 10.1128/iai.69.4.2700-2707.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracellular Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis in Buccal Epithelial Cells Collected from Human Subjects

Abstract: The mouth may provide an accessible model for studying bacterial interactions with human cells in vivo. Using fluorescent in situ hybridization and laser scanning confocal microscopy, we found that human buccal epithelial cells from 23 of 24 subjects were infected with intracellular bacteria, including the periodontal pathogens Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis, as well as other species which have yet to be identified. Buccal cell invasion may allow fastidious anaerobes to estab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
153
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
9
153
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, the complex relationship between the subgingival microbiota and the epithelium of the gingival crevice in such infections has only been partially determined. A great deal of evidence has accumulated which corroborates the ability of putative periodontal pathogens, such as Prevotella intermedia (Dorn et al, 1998), Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (FivesTaylor et al, 1995;Meyer et al, 1996;Rudney et al, 2001), Porphyromonas gingivalis (Sandros et al, 1994;Lamont et al, 1995;Madianos et al, 1996), Fusobacterium nucleatum (Han et al, 2000), and several species of oral spirochaetes (Peters et al, 1999), to adhere to and invade oral epithelial tissues and cells. However, most of these studies were performed in vitro, using few reference bacterial strains, and oral epithelial cell lines, primary epithelial cell cultures or cells from the buccal mucosa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Yet, the complex relationship between the subgingival microbiota and the epithelium of the gingival crevice in such infections has only been partially determined. A great deal of evidence has accumulated which corroborates the ability of putative periodontal pathogens, such as Prevotella intermedia (Dorn et al, 1998), Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (FivesTaylor et al, 1995;Meyer et al, 1996;Rudney et al, 2001), Porphyromonas gingivalis (Sandros et al, 1994;Lamont et al, 1995;Madianos et al, 1996), Fusobacterium nucleatum (Han et al, 2000), and several species of oral spirochaetes (Peters et al, 1999), to adhere to and invade oral epithelial tissues and cells. However, most of these studies were performed in vitro, using few reference bacterial strains, and oral epithelial cell lines, primary epithelial cell cultures or cells from the buccal mucosa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Indeed, intracellular P. gingivalis cells remain viable and capable of spreading between host cells [5], and epithelial cells can survive for prolonged periods after infection with P. gingivalis [6]. Moreover, epithelial cells recovered from the oral cavity show high levels of intracellular P. gingivalis [7][8][9], indicating that an intracellular location is an integral component of the lifestyle of this organism and contributes to persistence in the oral cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best hybridization conditions were found to be at a temperature of 59 • C for 150 min, which make our FISH protocol as fast as the previously reported for DNA-FISH (Zijnge et al, 2010;Rudney et al, 2001;Colombo et al, 2007;Stoltenberg et al, 1993;Sunde et al, 2003;Rudney et al, 2005a,b;Johnson et al, 2008) and suitable both for clinical, if it proves useful (Colombo et al, 2009;Sayehmiri et al, 2015;Hong et al, 2015), and research purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The PgPNA1007 probe has a higher theoretical performance in P. gingivalis detection compared with the DNA probes used in several previous studies (Rudney et al, 2001;Colombo et al, 2007;Stoltenberg et al, 1993;Sunde et al, 2003;Rudney et al, 2005a,b;Johnson et al, 2008). Its theoretical performance is only comparable to the DNA probe previously developed by Sunde et al (2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation