1990
DOI: 10.1016/0143-4160(90)90081-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracellular Ca2+ measurement with Indo-1 in substrate-attached cells: Advantages and special considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, photobleaching is not a significant problem in these studies. This result is not surprising because previous workers have noted that photobleaching is not a significant problem for indo-1-labeled adherent cells for up to 30 min of observation (35).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Therefore, photobleaching is not a significant problem in these studies. This result is not surprising because previous workers have noted that photobleaching is not a significant problem for indo-1-labeled adherent cells for up to 30 min of observation (35).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Similarly the work of Zagari et al (1989) Grynkiewicz et al (1985), and the ratios of standards containing known amounts of Ca2' and fura-2 (free acid) were measured under the same conditions used in experiments on the microscope. In situ calibration using fura-2 gives similar fluorescence ratios, as has been shown in previous work (Williams et al, 1985;Wahl et al, 1990;Wahl et al, 1992). Indo-1.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Indo-1. Unlike the situation for fura-2, the in situ fluorescence ratio as a function of Ca2+ curve is significantly different from the curve obtained in vitro (Popov et al, 1988;Wahl et al, 1990). For (1985) and Williams et al (1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations