SummaryBrain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a member of the neurotrophin family, plays critical roles in the survival, growth, and maintenance of brain and peripheral neurons. We report the presence of BDNF protein in human platelets and its release upon agonist stimulation. The BDNF content of washed platelets varied widely, from 3.5 to 67 ng/ 4 X 108 platelets, averaging 25.2 ± 21.2 ng/4 X 108 platelets (mean ± SD). The BDNF concentration in platelet-poor plasma was low (1.7 ± 1.7 ng/ml, n = 11). Thrombin, collagen, the Ca++ ionophore A23187, and shear stress each induced a rapid release of BDNF from platelets. Up to only half of platelet BDNF was secreted upon agonist stimulation, suggesting that platelets may have a non-releasable pool of BDNF, or that the released BDNF binds to a recognition site on the platelet surface and is internalized, as occurs with serotonin. However, the cognate BDNF receptor, TrkB, was not detected in platelets. Nevertheless, the ability of BDNF to bind washed platelets was shown by FACS analysis confocal microscopy and by the binding and apparent internalization of [125I]-BDNF by platelets. A very high affinity site (Kd = 130 X 10−15 M, ∼80 sites/platelet) and a moderately high affinity site (Kd = 20 nM, ∼3750 sites/platelet) were identified. The BDNF content in two mega-karyocytic cell lines, DAMI and Meg-01, was only 0.1% of the content measured in platelets. No BDNF mRNA was detected by Northern blotting in these cell lines or in platelets. The pituitary gland was also ruled out as a source for platelet BDNF, since the BDNF content of rat platelets did not decrease 2 weeks after hypophysectomy. Thus, platelet BDNF is not acquired from the megakaryocyte or pituitary gland, but is probably acquired from other sources via the blood circulation. Platelets appear to bind, store and release BDNF upon activation at the site of traumatic injury to facilitate the repair of peripheral nerves or other tissues that contain TrkB.

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is an abundant neurotrophin in brain and peripheral nerves, where it affects neural development, survival and repair after injury. BDNF has been detected in rat and human blood, but the source of circulating BDNF is not established. BDNF messenger and peptide were detected in cultured cells and in the culture medium of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. The expression of BDNF was up-regulated by elevation of intracellular cAMP and down-regulated by Ca 2+ ionophore, bovine brain extract and laminar fluid shear stress. These results suggest that vascular endothelial cells may contribute to circulating BDNF.z 2000 Federation of European Biochemical Societies.

No abstract

Background Blockade of platelet activation during primary percutaneous intervention for acute myocardial infarction is standard care to minimize stent thrombosis. To determine whether antiplatelet agents offer any direct cardioprotective effect, we tested whether they could modify infarction in a rabbit model of ischemia/reperfusion caused by reversible ligation of a coronary artery. Methods and Results The P2Y12 (adenosine diphosphate) receptor blocker cangrelor administered shortly before reperfusion in rabbits undergoing 30-minute regional ischemia/3-hour reperfusion reduced infarction from 38% of ischemic zone in control hearts to only 19%. Protection was dose dependent and correlated with the degree of inhibition of platelet aggregation. Protection was comparable to that seen with ischemic postconditioning (IPOC). Cangrelor protection, but not its inhibition of platelet aggregation, was abolished by the same signaling inhibitors that block protection from IPOC suggesting protection resulted from protective signaling rather than anticoagulation. As with IPOC, protection was lost when cangrelor administration was delayed until 10 minutes after reperfusion and no added protection was seen when cangrelor and IPOC were combined. These findings suggest both IPOC and cangrelor may protect by the same mechanism. No protection was seen when cangrelor was used in crystalloid-perfused isolated hearts indicating some component in whole blood is required for protection. Clopidogrel had a very slow onset of action requiring 2 days of treatment before platelets were inhibited, and only then the hearts were protected. Signaling inhibitors given just prior to reperfusion blocked clopidogrel’s protection. Neither aspirin nor heparin was protective. Conclusions Clopidogrel and cangrelor protected rabbit hearts against infarction. The mechanism appears to involve signal transduction during reperfusion rather than inhibition of intravascular coagulation. We hypothesize that both drugs protect by activating IPOC’s protective signaling to prevent reperfusion injury. If true, patients receiving P2Y12 inhibitors before percutaneous intervention may already be postconditioned thus explaining failure of recent clinical trials of postconditioning drugs